期刊文献+

本土文化视角:从学科“定义”走向知识的“限定”

Indigenous Culture as the Basic Limitation of Psychology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学派林立时代的心理学家各自追求心理学总体性的宏大定义。行为主义革命,特别是其方法学取向,为心理学研究带来第一种限定性的判别标准。根据这种判别标准,心理学出现了压倒性的主流范式。这种判定标准贯穿行为主义和认知主义时代。随着形而上学行为主义被认知革命否定,心理学发展到缺乏任何知识、立场统一性的学科碎裂时代。继生态批评之后,本土心理学把本土文化作为心理学知识的效度标准,在跨文化心理学和文化心理学理念的基础上,谋求心理学知识学效度的解决。 In the era of schools of psychology, the psychologists pursue the macro-definltion respectively. The behavioral revolution, especially the methodological behaviorism, brings the limitative criterion for discriminating psychological study. On account of this criterion, the mainstreams or paradigms begin to dominate psychology. Such criterion runs through the eras of behaviorism and cognitivism. Along with the metaphysical behaviorism disaffirmed by cognitive revolution, psychology runs into the era of discipline fragmentation without any consistency on knowlcdge or on standpoints. Succeeding to the ecological criticism, the indigenous psychology claims the indigenous culture as the validity criterion of psychology knowledge. On the basis of cross--cultural psychology and cultural psychology, the indigenous psychology seeks for the resolution to psychology knowledge validity.
作者 宋晓东
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第11期35-38,共4页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 范式 学科碎裂时代 本土心理学 本土文化 知识学效度 paradigml the era of fragmentation indigenous psychology indigenous culture knowledge validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Kwang-Kuo Hwang. The Third Wave of Cultural Psychology:The Indigenous Movement[J]. Psychologist, 2005, 18(2) : 80--83. 被引量:1
  • 2叶浩生.试析现代西方心理学的文化转向[J].心理学报,2001,33(3):270-275. 被引量:66
  • 3恩斯特·卡西尔.人文科学的逻辑[M].关之尹译.上海译文出版社,2004:111. 被引量:1
  • 4Uichol Kim Chung-Ang, Young-shin Park, Donghyun 'Park. The Korean Indigenous Psychology Approach:Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Applications Applied Psychology[J]. An International Review, 1999,48(4):451-465. 被引量:1
  • 5Rolando Diaz-loving. The Indigenization of Psychology: Birth of A New Science or Rekindling of An Old One?Applied Psychology[J]. An International Review, 1999,48(4):433--449. 被引量:1
  • 6Ype H Poortinga. Do Differences in Behavior Imply A Need for Different Psychology? Applied Psychology[J]. An International Review, 1999,48(4):419-432. 被引量:1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Szapocznik J, Kurtines W. Familypsychology and cultural diversity. American Psychologist, 1993,48(4):400 被引量:1
  • 2Gergen K J. Social psychology as history. Journal of personality and socialpsychology, 1973, 26(2):309-320 被引量:1
  • 3Sampson E E. Scientific paradigms and social values: Wanted-a scientificrevolution. Journal of personality and social psychology,1978,36:1332-1340 被引量:1
  • 4Prilldtensky I. Psychology and status quo. American Psychologist,1989, 44(5):797 被引量:1
  • 5Vindhya U. Feminist challenge to psychology. Psychology and Developing Societies.1998, 10(1):66 被引量:1
  • 6Fowers B, Richardson F. Why is multiculturalism good? American Psychologist, 1996,51(6):610 被引量:1
  • 7Sue D, Bingham R. The diversification of psychology: A multicultural revolution.American Psychologist. 1999, 54(12):1061-1069 被引量:1
  • 8Miller J. Taking culture into account in social cognitive Development. Psychologyand Developing Societies, 1997, 9(1):9-10 被引量:1
  • 9Rogler H L. Methodological sources of cultural insensitivity in mental healthresearch. American Psychologist, 1999, 54(6):424-433 被引量:1
  • 10Pedersen P. Multiculturalism as a fourth force. Tayor and Francis.1999.3-14 被引量:1

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部