摘要
学派林立时代的心理学家各自追求心理学总体性的宏大定义。行为主义革命,特别是其方法学取向,为心理学研究带来第一种限定性的判别标准。根据这种判别标准,心理学出现了压倒性的主流范式。这种判定标准贯穿行为主义和认知主义时代。随着形而上学行为主义被认知革命否定,心理学发展到缺乏任何知识、立场统一性的学科碎裂时代。继生态批评之后,本土心理学把本土文化作为心理学知识的效度标准,在跨文化心理学和文化心理学理念的基础上,谋求心理学知识学效度的解决。
In the era of schools of psychology, the psychologists pursue the macro-definltion respectively. The behavioral revolution, especially the methodological behaviorism, brings the limitative criterion for discriminating psychological study. On account of this criterion, the mainstreams or paradigms begin to dominate psychology. Such criterion runs through the eras of behaviorism and cognitivism. Along with the metaphysical behaviorism disaffirmed by cognitive revolution, psychology runs into the era of discipline fragmentation without any consistency on knowlcdge or on standpoints. Succeeding to the ecological criticism, the indigenous psychology claims the indigenous culture as the validity criterion of psychology knowledge. On the basis of cross--cultural psychology and cultural psychology, the indigenous psychology seeks for the resolution to psychology knowledge validity.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第11期35-38,共4页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
范式
学科碎裂时代
本土心理学
本土文化
知识学效度
paradigml the era of fragmentation
indigenous psychology
indigenous culture
knowledge validity