期刊文献+

公务员约束与激励机制的中外比较研究 被引量:2

A Comparative Study between China and Foreign Countries of the Restraint and Incentive Mechanisms for Civil Servants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于国情等多方面客观因素的不同,使各个国家在约束激励机制建立与应用方面存在着差异。与国外的公务员约束与激励机制相比,我国公务员的权利宽泛、但义务的规定较弱;工资福利制度结构设置不科学、总体工资水平低;在奖惩方面,重精神奖惩、轻物质奖惩,且奖惩制度粗糙;公务员的申诉与控告范围要进一步扩大、救济方式应多样化,并须对申诉与控告制度加强法制化。 Due to the various national conditions and other objective factors, countries around the world are different from one another in the institution and application of restraint and incentive mechanisms for public servants. Compared with their counterparts in other countries, the civil servants in China are entrusted with broader authority yet fuzzier responsibility. Generally speaking, they are poorly paid owing to the imperfect salary and welfare systems. Besides, the restraint and incentive mechanisms instituted for them tend to be coarse in nature and are always administered spiritually rather than materially. It is required, according to the author, that the realm of complaint and accusation against the civil servants be enlarged, means of remedy be diversified, and the complaining system be legalized.
作者 刘树桥
出处 《惠州学院学报》 2007年第5期50-54,共5页 Journal of Huizhou University
关键词 公务员 公务员法 约束与激励机制 中外比较 civil servant civil servant law restraint and incentive mechanism comparison between China and foreign countries
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1姜海如著..中外公务员制度比较[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003:386.
  • 2孔昌生主编,中组部研究室(政策法规局),人事部政策法规司编..外国公务员法选编[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:607.
  • 3黄卫平,谭功荣主编..公务员制度比较[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2002:359.

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部