期刊文献+

乳腺癌误诊32例分析 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析造成乳腺癌误诊的原因,找出对策,提高乳腺癌诊断水平。方法:对2001-09~2007-05我院接诊的32例外院误诊的乳腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,找出误诊原因。结果:对年轻女性乳腺癌的警惕性低、部分基层医师乳腺疾病知识匮乏、诊疗程序不规范、乳腺癌早期诊断意识缺乏、辅助检查选择不合理、影像检查报告不规范是造成误诊的主要原因。结论:加强基层医师培训,普及乳腺癌早期诊断相关知识,规范诊疗程序,规范乳腺影像检查有助于减少乳腺癌的误诊。
出处 《中国误诊学杂志》 CAS 2007年第25期6052-6053,共2页 Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1刘君,方志沂.我国乳腺癌的病理与临床特点[M].//徐兵河.乳腺癌.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2005:105. 被引量:1
  • 2Xiong Q,Valero V,Kau V,et al.Female patients with breast carcinoma age 30 years and younger have a poor prognosis:the MD Anderson cancer center experience[J].Cancer,2001,92(10):2523-2528. 被引量:1
  • 3顾雅佳,吴斌,张帅,杨天锡.使用乳腺影像报告和数据系统诊断乳腺疾病的体会[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(9):931-936. 被引量:27
  • 4傅西林.乳腺肿瘤病理组织学诊断[A].见:李树玲主编.乳腺肿瘤学[C].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2000.57~130. 被引量:2

二级参考文献16

  • 1American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 3th ed. Reston: Am College Radiol, 1998.1-90. 被引量:1
  • 2Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Finder C, et al. Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer. AJR,2002,178:797-803. 被引量:1
  • 3Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter-and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR, 2000, 174:1769-1777. 被引量:1
  • 4Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE Jr. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR, 1996, 166:773-778. 被引量:1
  • 5Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR, 1998, 171:35-40. 被引量:1
  • 6DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 1988, 44:837-845. 被引量:1
  • 7Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen HJ, et al. Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS, 1989, 97:689-698. 被引量:1
  • 8Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977, 33:159-174. 被引量:1
  • 9Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, et al. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radilolgy, 1999, 211:845-850. 被引量:1
  • 10Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, et al. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR, 2002, 179:691-695. 被引量:1

共引文献27

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部