期刊文献+

不同浓度罗哌卡因骶管阻滞在肛肠手术中的应用效果比较 被引量:4

The comparison of the different concentration of ropivacaine being used by caudal block in anus and rectum operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨3种不同浓度罗哌卡因复合利多卡因骶管阻滞在肛肠手术中的镇痛效果和运动阻滞程度。方法:肛肠手术患者120例,ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级,随机分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ3组,每组40例。采取左侧卧位,暴露骶部,自尾骨尖端向头端方向4cm处骶裂孔行骶管阻滞。穿刺成功后,Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组分别注入0.1%罗哌卡因+1%利多卡因、0.15%罗哌卡因+1%利多卡因、0.2%罗哌卡因+1%利多卡因,每组均注入20ml。结果:Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组镇痛优良率分别为80%、75%、93%,Ⅲ组明显高于Ⅰ、Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。3组运动阻滞程度评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:0.2%罗哌卡因+1%利多卡因骶管阻滞适用于肛肠手术,镇痛效果满意,运动阻滞很少,安全范围大,值得临床推广应用。 Objective: To compare the analgesia effect and movement block extent of three different concentration ropivacaine combined with lidocaine used in caudal block in anus and rectum operation. Methods: One hundred and twenty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patientslwith anus and rectum operation were randomly divided into 3 groups. All the three groups were infused 20 ml combined local anesthetics by caudal block. Group I were infused with 0.1% ropivacaine combined with 1% lidocaine. Group 11 were infused with 0. 15% ropivacaine combined with 1% lidocaine. Group Ⅲ were infused with 0.2% ropivacaine combined with 1% lidocaine. BP, SpO2 and ECG were monitored continually. Results: There were significant reduction in VAS scale between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰor Ⅱ (P 〈0.05). The movement block extent adopted Bromage scale, and there groups was no difference (P〈0.05). Conclusions: The caudal block with 0.2% ropivacaine combined with 1% lidocaine is refered to anus and rectum operation and deserves to spread its application in clinic because its satisfiable analgesia effect, less movement blockade and safe.
作者 赵宏 李亦梅
出处 《新疆医科大学学报》 CAS 2007年第8期882-883,共2页 Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词 罗哌卡因 骶管阻滞 镇痛效果 运动阻滞 ropivacaine caudal block analgesia effect movement block
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘延青,王平,牟桂玲,张少臣,安玉风,赵娜.经骶裂孔硬膜外前间隙穿刺置管1047例回顾总结[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2004,10(6):332-334. 被引量:7
  • 2Scott DB,Lee A,Fagan D,et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg,1989,69:563-569. 被引量:1
  • 3Finucane BT, Sandler AN, Mckenna J, et al. A doubleblind comparison of ropivacaine 0. 5% ,0. 75% ,1.0% and bupivacaine 0. 5 %, injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, Can J Anaesth, 1996,43:442-449. 被引量:1
  • 4Da Conceicao MJ, Coelho L. Caudal anaesthesia with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0. 375% bupivacaine in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth, 1998,80: 507-508. 被引量:1
  • 5Gautier PE, De Kock M, Van Steenberge A, et al. Intrathecal ropivacaine for ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology, 1999,91:1239-1245. 被引量:1
  • 6Santos AC,Arthur GR,Wlody D,et al. Comparative systemic toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in nonpregnant ewes. Anesthesiology, 1995,82: 734-740. 被引量:1
  • 7Long BW, Rosenblums,Grady IP. Successful resuscittaation of bupuvacaine induced cardiacarrest using cardiopulmary bypass. Anesth Analg, 1989,69 : 403-406. 被引量:1
  • 8Breen TW, Shapiro T,Glass B, et al. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg, 1993,77 : 919-924. 被引量:1
  • 9Kajikawa S, Suzuki M, Yokoi M. Preoperative complications and intraoperative hemodynamic changes in very old patients with femoral neck fractures. Masui, 2000,49 : 995-999. 被引量:1
  • 10Critchley LA, Morley AP, Derrick J . The influence of baricity on the hemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5%.Anaesthesia, 1999,54 : 469-474. 被引量:1

共引文献139

同被引文献9

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部