摘要
知识产权侵权损害赔偿采用何种归责原则,事关知识产权权利人的权益及普遍公众的公共利益。无过错责任原则在知识产权侵权损害赔偿领域的适用打破了知识产权权利人和公共利益的平衡,影响了知识产权制度平衡机制的正常运转,歪曲了知识产权激励机制的本意,束缚了一般民事主体创造知识产品的热情。无过错责任原则在知识产权领域的适用有其天然的弊端和不足,而TRIPS协议第45条也并未将该原则作为一般原则来对待,即便按照民法学方法分析,知识产权侵权损害赔偿也不应适用无过错责任原则。
The intelligent property right infringement indemnity adoption what return the responsibility principle, the matter pass intelligent property right right rights of the person and public benefits of the widespread public.Applied to break the intelligent property right right in the intelligent property right infringement indemnity realm without the fault responsibility principle person and balance of public benefits, affected the normal operation of equilibrium mechanism of the intelligent property right system, falsity the intelligent property right encourage the mechanism original meaning, tying up the general civil case corpus to create the enthusiasm of the knowledge product. Apply to have it the natural irregularity and shortages in the intelligent property right realm without the fault responsibility principle, and the TRIPS agreement Article 45s also did not treat general principle of that principle conduct and actions to, learning the method analysis according to the civil law even if, the intelligent property right infringement indemnity also shouldn＇t apply without the fault responsibility principle.
出处
《经济研究导刊》
2007年第10期129-132,共4页
Economic Research Guide
关键词
知识产权
损害赔偿
无过错责任原则
公共利益
intelligent property right
infringement indemnity
without fault responsibility principle
public benefits
