摘要
《卜居》、《渔父》两篇,因王逸解题称"屈原之所作也"且又为朱熹、洪兴祖肯定后,即被视为屈原的重要楚辞作品。但自明清以来,已多有学者怀疑并证伪。从其文体和文风来看,两篇当不是屈原的作品。据战国后期的楚国历史文化背景和战国至汉初的文学发展状况推断,两篇应作于楚考烈王时代、出自楚国具有道家思想的隐士之手。两篇的产生,反映出战国末年的楚人对屈原已经有了较为全面深刻的认识,反映出屈原在战国末年乃至秦末所形成的巨大社会影响。
＂Buju＂ （ 卜居） and ＂Yufu＂ （渔父） are regarded as Qu Yuan＇ s important works, because Wang Yi（王逸） and Zhu Xi（朱熹）.Hong Xing-zhu（洪兴祖） thought they were written by Qu Yuan had the same opinion as Wang Yi. But since the Ming Dynasty, there have been many scholars who doubted this theory and proved it wrong. Judging from the two works＇ style and the style of writing, they should not be written by Qu Yuan. According to the historical and cultural background of Chu State during the late Warring States Periods and the situation of literary development from Warring States Periods to the early Han Dynast,we can infer the works should be written by hermits who had Taoism in Chu Kaolie king （楚考烈王）＇ times. The appearance of the two works reflected people who lived in Chu State already had deep and comparatively all-round cognition about Qu Yuan, and also reflected Qu Yuan had huge social impact in late Warring States Periods and even to the late Qin Dynasty
出处
《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第5期62-67,共6页
Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词
卜居
渔父
屈原
影响
＂Buju＂（ 卜居）
＂Yufu＂（渔父）
Qu Yuan
impact
