期刊文献+

道之文——论经学信仰与儒士对文道关系的理解 被引量:1

On the Belief in Classic Studies and the Confucian Scholars' Understanding of the Relationship between Writing and the Tao
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在相当长的时间里,儒家"文以载道"的文学观念被视为经学"附庸"的典型而受到批判。今天,当我们换一种言说方式,经由经学信仰的视域透视儒家"载道"的文学观念时,我们可以洞见儒士的经学信仰在诗学层面得以显现的可能,并由此体悟历代儒士对"文"、"道"及其相互关系的差异性理解的原因。 For an enormous long period of time, the Confucian literary notion "that to write is to embody the Tao" has been subject to critique as the vassal of classic studies. At present, however, if we shift into another mode of speaking and survey this notion through the field of vision of the belief in classic studies, we will get an insight into the possibihty of its presentation at the level of poetry, and, therefore, comprehend the reason why there have been different understandings of writing and the Tao and the relationship between them in the past dynasties.
作者 李丽琴
出处 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2007年第4期31-37,共7页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 经学 理解 道之文 终极关切 classic studies understanding the writing of "Tao" ultimate concern
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1罗根泽著..中国文学批评史 3[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1984.
  • 2朱刚著..唐宋四大家的道论与文学[M].北京:东方出版社,1997:255.
  • 3姚淦铭,王燕编..王国维文集 第3卷[M].北京:中国文史出版社,1997:475.
  • 4陈寅恪著..陈寅恪史学论文选集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992:720.
  • 5[5]Hans-Georg Gadamer,Truth and Method[M].New York:The Crossroad Publishing Company,1975. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Paul Tillich,Theology of Culture[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1964. 被引量:1
  • 7章学诚著..文史通义 4[M].北京:中华书局,1985:304.
  • 8[8]朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔.朱子全书:第21册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,合肥:安徽教育出版社,2002. 被引量:1
  • 9罗宗强..古代文学理论研究[M],2002.
  • 10彭亚非.原“文”——论“文”之初始义及元涵义[J].文学评论,2005(4):75-82. 被引量:3

二级参考文献18

共引文献91

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部