摘要
以塔洛克四边形的形式而存在的垄断利润未必一定导致非生产性寻利活动。如果垄断的原因不是行政因素,而是有利的成本结构或者专利技术等等,那么导致的将不是寻租这样的非生产性寻利活动,而是努力降低成本和潜心发明创造这样的生产性寻利活动。塔洛克四边形不应该算做一般垄断的社会成本,而只是行政垄断的社会成本。即使是行政垄断,我们也不能对多大比例的垄断利润应该算作行政垄断的社会成本做出一般结论。
The monopoly profit in the form of Ttdlock rectangle does not necessarily lead to non-productive profit-seeking behaviors. If the cause of monopoly is not administrative factors but profitable cost structure or patented technologies, the result will not be such non-productive profit-seeking behaviors as rent-seeking but the productive profit-seeking, like trying to lower cost and devoting to invention and innovation. Tullock rectangle shall not be regarded as the ordinary monopoly social cost, but as the social cost of administrative monopoly. Even if for administrative monopoly, it is hard to draw a general conclusion as to what percentage of monopoly profit shall be taken as the social cost of administrative monopoly.
出处
《河北经贸大学学报》
2007年第4期1-4,共4页
Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2006年度重大项目"正交易费用约束下的垄断分析框架:垄断与反垄断理论再建构及经验验证"
中国博士后基金项目"正交易费用下的垄断分析框架"阶段性研究成果
关键词
垄断
塔洛克四边形
寻租
社会成本
monopoly
Tullock rectangle
rent-seeking
social cost
