期刊文献+

中美减排二氧化碳的GDP溢出模拟 被引量:14

An analysis of the GDP spillover effects of carbon abatement between China and the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于气候保护模型(State-contingent模型与Demeter模型)和GDP溢出模型(Mundell-Fleming模型),对中美两国在实施控制性气候保护措施之后所导致的GDP溢出影响的变化进行了模拟分析。结果表明,美国实行控制性减排政策对于中国的GDP溢出影响与不实施任何减排的情况相比,两者的差别并不明显,但是这种影响经历一个从负向到正向逐步上升的发展趋势,虽然中国实行控制性减排政策对于美国GDP溢出的影响,相比美国对于中国的影响,所导致的GDP溢出影响更小,但是也同样表现出了一个从负溢出到正溢出的过程。这一结果表明一国的控制性气候保护政策从长远来看会对另一国的经济发展产生正向的溢出。同时,针对两种情况,即不考虑他国GDP溢出影响和考虑他国GDP溢出影响,分别模拟计算了中美两国的GDP,进而对两种情况下的差额结果进行对比,分析了中美相互之间GDP溢出量的大小。结果发现,美国对中国GDP溢出影响要大于中国对美国的GDP溢出。 This paper supplements the literature about the effects of reducing carbon dioxide emissi simulate the international GDP spillovers as a result of climate protection policy. A simulating system, on in which an attempt to is intended to model domestic effects of mitigating carbon emissions as well as international effects represented by GDP spillovers, is constructed in this paper. The model system is based on three well-known models, State-contingent model, Demeter model, and Mundell-Fleming. The noticeable contribution of this paper lies in the integration of climate-economy model and the international GDP spillover model. Thus, it is possible to realize the analysis of international GDP spillovers caused by the anticipated climate protection actions from different countries. The United States and China, the two countries with the most carbon emissions in the present world, are taken as examples to implement the model. Six scenarios of countermeasure for global warming in two countries are set up to identify the effects of different actions. Whether or not to reduce carbon emission and also the different level of carbon reduction are included in these scenarios. The results show that the effects of American policy of reducing carbon emission on China's GDP are more considerable than the effect of China's policy on American GDP. These two effects both go through a process from the negative sign to the positive sign. The policy implication of the research is that the China's GDP growth could take the advantage of American climate protection policy in the long term.
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第9期3718-3726,共9页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40371007) 中国发展研究基金会资助项目~~
关键词 气候保护 GDP溢出 宏观经济影响 climate protection GDP spillovers effects of macro economy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1[9]Zhan Z X.Macroeconomic effects of CO\-2 emission limits:a computable general equilibrium analysis for China.J.Policy Modeling, 1998,20(2):213~250. 被引量:1
  • 2[10]China statistical yearbook,1978~1999.China statistics Press,2000. 被引量:1
  • 3[1]IPCC.1996.climate Change 1995-Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change-Contribution of Working Group Ⅲ to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.ed.J.Bruce,Hoesung Lee and E.Haites,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1996. 被引量:1
  • 4[2]IPCC.IPCC First Assessment Report:Overview,WGI Policymakers Summary,WGⅡ Policymakers summary,WGⅢ Policymakers Summary,Oxford University Press,1996. 被引量:1
  • 5[3]Austin D A.Social security as an economic stabilization program,J.of Macroeconomics,1999,21(2):300~333. 被引量:1
  • 6[4]Alcamo J,Kreileman E.Emission scenarios and global climate protection.Global Environmental Change.1996,6(4):305~334. 被引量:1
  • 7[5]Boehmer-Christiansen S.Global climate protection policy:the limits of scintific advice,Global Environment Change,1994,4(2):140~159. 被引量:1
  • 8[6]leimbach M.Modeling climate protection expenditure.Global Environmental Change,1998,8(2):125~139. 被引量:1
  • 9[7]Nordau W D.Managing the Global Commons:The Economics of Climate Change,MIT Press,Cambridge,MA 1994. 被引量:1
  • 10[8]Shen J.China's future population and development challenges.The Geographical Journal,1999,164:32~40. 被引量:1

共引文献112

同被引文献195

引证文献14

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部