期刊文献+

吸收能力与组织探索性—开发性创新的形成及惯性 被引量:7

Organizational Absorptive Capacity and the Formation of Exploration & Exploitation Innovation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有的分析框架探讨了组织的探索性与开发性创新和组织绩效之间的关系,但也存在着明显的缺陷,即未能探讨组织探索性与开发性创新形成的组织影响因素及其作用机理。研究表明,组织的吸收能力在促进或抑制组织两类创新过程中起了关键的作用。其中,实现的吸收能力有助于开发性创新的形成,而潜在的吸收能力则保障了探索性创新所需知识的获取。同时,由于吸收能力的惯性特征,导致了组织探索性创新和开发性创新的惯性。 The existing organization exploration & exploitation analysis framework discussed the relationship between explorative & exploitative innovation and organization performance. But the limitation is that the analysis framework did not consider some key organizational factors and their functional mechanism. Research explored that organization absorptive capacity and its inertia has significant importance in the process of organization innovation, and gives the conclusion that the realized absorptive capacity facilitates the exploitation innovation, and the potential absorptive capacity helps to ensure the new knowledge exploration innovation requires. And, the inertia of absorptive capacity results in the inertia of explorative & exploitative innovations.
作者 孔继红 茅宁
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期63-67,共5页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70472046)
关键词 探索性-开发性 吸收能力 惯性 创新 exploration & exploitation absorptive capacity inertia innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1March, J G. , 1991, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,2. 被引量:1
  • 2Hill, C. W. L. , & Rothaermel, F. T. , 2003. The Performance of Incumbent Finns in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation. Academy of Management Review,28. 被引量:1
  • 3He, Zi-Lin. Poh-Kam Wong. , 2004. Exploration vs. Exploitation : An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, Vol. 15,No. 4. 被引量:1
  • 4Holmqvist, M., 2004. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration: an empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15. 被引量:1
  • 5Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D., 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A new Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35. 被引量:1
  • 6Zahra, S.A. , & George, G. , 2002. Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27. 被引量:1
  • 7Leonard-Barton, D. A. , 1992. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13. 被引量:1
  • 8Szulanski, G. , 1996. Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practices within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17. 被引量:1
  • 9Teece, D. J., 1981. The multinational enterprise: Market failure and market power considerations. Sloan Management Review, 22 (3). 被引量:1
  • 10Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. 2001. Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities, and products. Strategic Management Journal,2. 被引量:1

同被引文献131

引证文献7

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部