摘要
梁启超的《中国史叙论》和《新史学》共同构成了"新史学"思潮的开端。《中国史叙论》表现为"建设"大于"批判";《新史学》表现为"批判"大于"建设"。两者都以建设中国的新史学为共同目标。"新史学"思潮涵盖了许多不同政治取向、却都看重史学的社会功能并且要求改变旧史学面貌的多数进步学人。"新史学"思潮以批判旧史学为特征,但是其构建"新史学"理论体系的努力和撰述新型中国通史的尝试等学术建树,亦不应被忽视。
Liang Qichao's Introduction of Chinese History and New Historiography marked the beginning of the thought of "New Historiography". Both of them were aiming at building Chinese new historiography. The thought of "New Historiography" involved most advanced scholars with various political standpoints, but all of them attached importance to the social function of history and desired to alter the appearance of the traditional historiography. The thought of "New Historiography" strived to frame the system of theory of "New Historiography" and tried to write new Chinese general history, which should not be neglected.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第9期94-102,共9页
Journal of Historical Science
关键词
新史学
“新史学”思潮
梁启超
New Historiography
the thought of "New Historiography"
Liang Qichao