期刊文献+

宫颈上皮内瘤变及鳞癌诊治过程中病理分级及治疗探讨 被引量:18

Pathological Grading and Treatment to CIN and Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)及鳞状细胞癌(鳞癌)活检、锥切或全子宫切除术后病理分级及转化。方法:对2003年1月至2006年9月CIN及鳞癌病例,行不同诊治手段,对比分析病理分级及其转化。结果:经阴道镜活检,病理证实CIN 217例,平均年龄38.9岁;鳞癌62例,平均年龄53.3岁。其中继续锥切诊治63例,直接子宫全切54例。转阴率、分级转低率、分级不变率和分级转高率分别为14.5%、19.7%、59.0%和6.8%。结论:本组活检诊断与锥切术后病理分级符合率仅59.0%,说明CIN为多点病变,分级变异性较大,活检甚至锥切不能代表真实病变。而且子宫全切术后转阴率较低,且有6.8%的分级转高率。应注意加大锥切的范围,增加其诊疗效果。 Objective: To investigate pathological grade and transformation of patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical squamous call Carcinoma (CSCC) treated by the cervix IMng specimen organization inspects (CLSOI), the LEEP oonization or hysterectomy. Mothods:Collecting the CIN and CSCC continual cases of dinical pathology material from Jan. 2003 to Sep. 2006 and contrastively analyzed the different diagnosis methods and the pathological grade and transforms. Reaults:The pathology confirmed CIN 279 cases and CSCC 62 cases in the CLSOI by vaginoscope. The average age is 38.9 years in CIN, 53.3 in CSCC. There were 63 cases underwent further conization, and 54 cases directly received hysterectomy. The rate of transferring to negative, degrade, grade stable, and upgrade respectively was 14.5%, 19.7%, 59.0%, and 6.8% after conization or hysterectomy.Cortdumlorm:The patilological grading coincidence is only 59.0% between the CLSOI and oonization which means CIN is the multidrop lesion with great variability of pathological grade. CLSOI, even conization could not reflect the true pattlology. After hysterectomy, the rate transferring to negative is low, while 6.8% of upgrade. One should extend the scope of conization and improve therapeutic effect.
机构地区 河北省人民医院
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第8期489-492,共4页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 河北省科技攻关计划项目资助(编号:05276101D-32)
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤变 鳞癌 锥切 Cervical intraepithelial neopiasia Cervical squamous call carcinoma Conization
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1张惠娇,李玲.宫颈锥切术在CIN中的诊断和治疗价值(附22例分析)[J].福建医药杂志,2002,24(2):13-14. 被引量:4
  • 2Livasy CA,Maygarden SJ,Rajaratnam CT,etal.Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3:a study of margin,endocervical gland,and quadrant involvement[J].Mod Pathol,1999,12(3):233-238. 被引量:1
  • 3刘燕飞,刘亚飞,赵红彩.宫颈环形电切术诊治宫颈上皮内瘤样病变510例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(11):2147-2147. 被引量:6
  • 4Di RomaE,Parlavecchio E,Vettraino G,etal.CIN:multicentric study of therapeutic strategies[J].Minerva Ginecol,2001,53(6):379-382. 被引量:1
  • 5Murta EF,Silva AO,Silva EA.Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure,conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].Eur J Gynaecol Oncol,2006,27(1):50-52. 被引量:1
  • 6Sankasem A,Thavaramara T,Manusirivithaya S,et al.Tumor persistence in high gradesquamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive surgical margin post loop electrosurgical excision procedure[J].J Med Assoc Thai,2006,89(7):934-940. 被引量:1

二级参考文献3

共引文献8

同被引文献102

引证文献18

二级引证文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部