摘要
供应商库存管理(VMI)已成为供应链管理的一个热点问题.利用博弈论作为主要分析工具,对同一供应链在三种不同库存激励合同下的效率进行了比较分析.结果表明,在实际中最常见的成本加利润的供货合同是次优的,导致了整个供应链的效率损失.简单的收入分成合同,虽然能在一定程度上提高整个供应链的效率,但仍然不是最优的.二元收入分成激励合同则可以使整个供应链的效率达到最高.
Vender-managed inventory is a hot issue now. The efficiency of the supply chain under three different incentive contracts based on game theory is analyzed comparatively. The results show that in practice the cost-adding-profit supply contracts is inferior, which lead to the whole supply chain inefficient. The simple revenue-sharing contracts can improve the efficiency of the whole supply chain to a certain extent, but not optimal as well. The dualistic revenue-sharing incentive contracts can make the whole supply chain＇s efficiency optimized.
出处
《中北大学学报（自然科学版）》
EI
CAS
2007年第4期373-376,共4页
Journal of North University of China(Natural Science Edition)
关键词
供应链
效率
博弈论
激励合同
supply chain
efficiency
game theory
incentive contracts
