期刊文献+

庄浪县林农和林草间作模式经济效益评价 被引量:12

Evaluation of economic benefits of the agro-forestry and grass-forestry system in Zhuanglang County
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用静态和动态评价方法,对平凉地区庄浪县周边乡镇处于不同生长周期的林农、林草间作模式与单纯种植农作物模式的经济效益进行对比分析和评价。结果表明:各林农、林草间作模式的总利润和年均利润都在单纯种植农作物的2.5倍以上,其中油松间作苜蓿模式的总利润最高,达到26万3 097元/hm2,为单纯种植农作物的5.16倍;各间作模式单位面积的年均利润现值均大于单纯种植农作物的年均利润现值4800.9元/hm2。因此,林农、林草间作模式先期投入虽然大,但有长期的经济效益,而且较单农种植明显适宜于在黄土丘陵沟壑区发展。 Using the methods of static evaluation and dynamic evaluation, the economical benefits of the agroforestry and grass-forestry system in different growth cycle in Zhuanglang County in the city of Pingliang were evaluated. These patterns were contrasted with the only-planting crops. Both the gross profits and average prof- its of intercropping models are 2.5 times as much as the profits of non-intercropping models. And the Pinus tabulaceformis Carr.-Medicago sativa L. intercropping model has the highest profits, which is 263 097 yuan/ hm^2, and 5.16 times as much as the non-intercropping. The present value(PV) of profits per hm^2 of all intercropping model is more than the PV of profits of non-intercropping models. Results showed that the economical benefits of agro-forestry and grass-forestry system are much better than the non-intercropping, which had longterm profits although it needs a larger antecedent investments.
出处 《中国水土保持科学》 CSCD 2007年第4期56-61,共6页 Science of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家科技支撑计划"黄土高原丘陵沟壑区保护性耕作技术集成研究与示范"(2006BAD15B06)
关键词 林农间作 林草间作 经济效益 评价 agro-forestry grass-forestry economical benefits evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献39

  • 1谢高地,鲁春霞,成升魁.全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].资源科学,2001,23(6):5-9. 被引量:478
  • 2王新华,张志强.黑河流域土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态环境,2004,13(4):608-611. 被引量:58
  • 3徐锡增 吕士行 等.杨粮间作的生产力及其经济效益.杨树定向培育技术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997.. 被引量:1
  • 4梁军 徐锡增 等.Ⅰ-69杨胶合板材用材林栽培动态经济效益评价.杨树定向培育技术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997.. 被引量:1
  • 5卢宗凡 梁一民 王继军.水土保持型生态农业发展阶段的探讨[A].安塞试区编.黄土丘陵沟壑区水土保持型生态农业研究(上册)[C].杨陵:天则出版社,1990.. 被引量:1
  • 6吴旗县地方志编纂委员会编.吴旗县县志[M].西安:三秦出版社,1991.. 被引量:2
  • 7吴旗县人民政府办公室编印.吴旗县秀美山川工程建设材料选编[Z].,2002,6.. 被引量:1
  • 8COSTANZA R, ARGE R, GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 386: 253-260. 被引量:1
  • 9BOLUND P, HUNHAMMAR S. Ecosystem services in urban areas[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 293-301. 被引量:1
  • 10BJORKLUND J, LIMBURG K, RYDBERG T. Impact of production intensity on the ability of agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 269-291. 被引量:1

共引文献120

同被引文献191

引证文献12

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部