摘要
我国刑法理论界对犯罪故意的分类有事前故意和事后故意之说。文中结合案例,以这种分类所依据的标准为切入点,进而对事前故意与事后故意两个概念从法理上展开分析,论证了这一学理分类所依据的标准本身存在逻辑错误,从而否定了这种分类的科学性以及事后故意概念的合理性。
There is a theory held by the theoretical field of Chinese criminal law that criminal intent can be divided into intent before the fact and intent after the fact. In the light of cases, this paper starts with the basis on which criminal intent is divided, analyzes jurisprudentially the term of intent before the fact and that of intent after the fact, and demonstrates the logical error of the basis on which criminal intent is divided, thus negatives the scientific division and the reasonable term of intent after the fact.
出处
《通化师范学院学报》
2007年第1期36-38,共3页
Journal of Tonghua Normal University
关键词
故意
事前故意
事后故意
批判
intent
intent before the fact
intent after the fact
criticism
