期刊文献+

乐观人格倾向问卷的编制及信效度研究 被引量:24

Dispositional Optimism Questionnaire:Development,Reliability,and Validity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨乐观人格倾向的理论模型,编制乐观人格倾向问卷。方法:分别对108名、216名及334名大学生组成的样本进行ELOT中译本问卷分析、乐观人格倾向预测问卷探索性因素分析和该问卷正式版验证性因素分析及信效度检验。结果:①ELOT问卷并未呈现两维性,统计指标未达应有标准。②探索性因素分析提示乐观人格倾向问卷支持一维结构理论,验证性因素分析表明一维模型拟合良好:2χ/df为3.32,RMSEA为0.08,SRMR为0.05,CFI为0.97等;信度较高:Cronbachs’α系数0.932,折半信度0.919,重测信度0.802。同时效度检验:乐观和生活满意度、抑郁和焦虑症状均有显著中等强度的相关。结论:乐观人格倾向为一维结构;乐观人格倾向问卷具有良好的心理测量学指标,可以用来测量个体的乐观人格倾向性。 Objective: To discuss the theory model of dispositional optimism and develop the Dispositional Optimism Questionnaire (DOQ) for Chinese People. Methods: ELOT was analyzed with a sample of 108 undergraduates. DOQ was developed and evaluate with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with two samples of 216 and 334 undergraduates respectively. Results: (1)ELOT did not show two-dimensions, and its statistical indexes were below the required standard. (2)Exploratory factor analysis showed that dispositional optimism questionnaire Supported one-dimensional structure,and confirmatory factor analysis of the one-dimensional model showed good fit: x^2/df was 3.32, RMSEA was 0.08,SRMR was 0.05,et al;the reliability and validity of DOQ was satisfying. Cronbach's alpha was 0.932, the split-half reliability was 0.919, and the retest reliability was 0.802. Optimism was moderately associated with life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety. Conclusion: Dispositional optimism has one-dimensional structure; the psychological measurement indexes are fine and DOQ can be used to measure the individual dispositional optimism.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2007年第4期335-338,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 乐观人格倾向 信度 效度 因素分析 Dispositional optimism Reliability Validity Factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1任俊,叶浩生.积极人格:人格心理学研究的新取向[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,44(4):120-126. 被引量:200
  • 2Scheier MF,Weintraub JK,Carver CS.Coping with stress:Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51 (6):1257-1264 被引量:1
  • 3Scheier MF,Carver CS,Bridges MW.Distinguishing Optimism From Neuroticism (and Trait Anxiety,Self-Mastery,and Self-Esteem):A Reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,67(6):1063-1078 被引量:1
  • 4Hatchett GT,Park HL.Relationships among optimism,coping styles,psychopathology,and counseling outcome.Personality and Individual Differences,2004,36:1755-1769 被引量:1
  • 5Vickers KS,Vogeltanz ND.Dispositional optimism as a predictor of depressive symptoms over time.Personality and Individual Differences,2000,28(2):259-272 被引量:1
  • 6Scheier MF,Carver CS.Optimism,coping,and health:Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Health Psychology,1985,4:219-247 被引量:1
  • 7Marshall GN,Wortman CB,Kusulas JW,et al.Distinguishing optimism from pessimism:Relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992,62:1067-1074 被引量:1
  • 8Lai JCL.Relative predictive power of the optimism versus the pessimism index of a Chinese version of the Life Orien tation Test.Psychological Record,1997,47:399-410 被引量:1
  • 9Lai JCL,Yue X.Measuring optimism in Hong Kong and mainland Chinese with the revised Life Orientation Test.Personality and Individual Differences,2000,28:781-796 被引量:1
  • 10Diener E,Emmons RA,Larsen RJ,et al.The Satisfaction with Life Scale.Journal of Personality Assessment,1985,49:71-75 被引量:1

二级参考文献15

  • 1杨鑫辉.心理学通史(第五卷)[M].济南:山东教育出版社,2000.253-254. 被引量:8
  • 2Shultz, D. P,&. Shultz, S, E. A history of modern psychology[M]. Thomson Press, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 3Caprara and Cervone. A Conception of Personality for A Psychology of Human Strengths: Personality As An Agentic, Self-Regulating System[A]. in Aspinwall and Studinger. A Psychology of Human Strengths: Fundamental Questions and Future Directions for a Positive Psychology [C]. American Psychological Association, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 4Magnusson and Mahoney. A Holistic Person Approach for Research on Positive Dez,elopment[A]. In Aspinwall and Studinger. A Psychology of Human Strengths: Fundamental Questions and Future Directions for a Positive Psychology [C]. American Psychological Association, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 5Gottlieb. Normally Occurring Enz,ironmental and Behavioral Influences on Gene Actiz,ity: From Central Dogma to Probabilistic Epigenesis[J]. Psychological Review, 1998, (105). 被引量:1
  • 6Ed Diener. Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index[J].American Psychologist, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 7Myers. The Funds, Friends, and Faith of Happy People[J]. American Psychologist, 2000, (1). 被引量:1
  • 8Ryan &. Deci. Self-Determination Theory and The Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being[J]. American Psychologist,2000,(1). 被引量:1
  • 9Peterson. The Future of Optimism [J]. American Psychologist, 2000, ( 1 ). 被引量:1
  • 10Schneider. In Search of Realistic Optimism Meaning, Knowledge, and Warm Fuzziness [J]. American Psychologist, 2001, (3). 被引量:1

共引文献447

同被引文献352

引证文献24

二级引证文献260

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部