摘要
通过对郭店楚简《性自命出》等篇中的“情”义内涵的分析,本文认为其中的“情”仍然是“真实”,而不是“情感”之义。“情”在不同语境中虽有多种分析的涵义,但它们之间是统一的,皆根源于性情论之“情”。这为我们重构性情论的真实内容打下了坚实的基础。从“未发”和“已发”而言,“性”与“情”二者在郭店楚简中并不具备相互对应的特性,这与宋儒的性情论并不相同。从先秦到宋明的性情论,朱熹等人利用先秦儒家的相关文献作了创造性的转化;而Chad Hansen和A.C.Graham对中国早期文献中的“情”字义的某些观点,是值得批评的。
This paper holds that the notion of ＂qing＂ in Guodian texts doesn＇t mean ＂emotions＂ or ＂passions＂ but ＂what is essential＂ or ＂genuine＂ after a detail and profound analysis of Guodian texts such as Xing Zi Ming Chu. ＂Qing＂ has different implications in different contexts, but they axe unified and originated from the doctrine of xing - qing. There is no dount that these conclusions will tamp a true foundation and develop a brand- new horizon for the future doctrine of xingqing Moreover, there is no complete correspondent relationship between ＂xing＂ and ＂qing＂ in Guodian slips, which is very different from the doctrine of ring- qing in Song Dynasties. It can be said that Zhu Xi made a crucial creative transformation of doctrine of xing - qing from Pre- Qin to Song Dynasties. However, some points about ＂qing＂ in the early Chinese literatures that were made bv Chad Hansen and A. C. Graham axe not pertinent, therefore we should give them some criticisms.
出处
《现代哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第4期61-68,共8页
Modern Philosophy
关键词
情真实
情感
性情论
郭店楚简
《性自命出》
qing, genuine
emotions
doctrine of xing- qing
Guodian slips
Xing Zi Ming Chu
