期刊文献+

丙酸的加入对厌氧-低氧同时生物除磷脱氮系统的影响 被引量:10

Addition of Propionic Acid on Simultaneous Biological Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal in Anaerobic-Low Dissolved Oxygen System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2个实验室规模的序批式反应器(SBRs)在厌氧-低氧(0.15—0.45mg·L^-1)条件下运行,以比较丙酸的加入对同时生物除磷脱氮系统的影响.结果表明,无论是丙酸与乙酸的混合酸(碳摩尔比为1.5/1)作为碳源(SBR1),还是乙酸作为单独碳源(SBR2),系统都发生同步硝化反硝化和磷的去除(SNDPR),并且氨氮被全部氧化,系统中没有亚硝酸盐的大量累积.与SBR2相比,SBR1中厌氧阶段磷释放量少,聚羟基戊酸(PHV)合成量高,好氧末磷剩余量少,硝态氮累积少,因此SBR1中总氮和总磷的去除率(分别为68%和95%)比SBR2(分别为51%和92%)高,加入丙酸有助于SNDPR系统保持较好的除磷、脱氮效果. Two lab-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) were operated under conditions of anaerobic-low dissolved oxygen (DO) (0.15 - 0.45 mg·L^- 1 ), and the influences of addition of propionic acid on simultaneous biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal system were investigated. The results showed that the simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal (SNDPR) occurred in both SBR1 (acetic and propionic acid as mixed carbon source with the carbon molar ratio of 1.5/1) and SBR2 (acetic acid as sole carbon source), and ammonia was completely oxidized during the aerobic period without substantive nitrite accumulation. Compared with SBR2, SBR1 showed less anaerobic phosphorus release and more polyhydroxyvalerate (PHV) synthesis, but the aerobic end phosphorus and nitrate concentrations were lower. The total nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiencies were higher in SBR1 (68% and 95%, respectively) than in SBR2 (51% and 92%, respectively) suggesting that the addition of propionic acid to SNDPR system would be helpful.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第8期1681-1686,共6页 Environmental Science
基金 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20060247006) 上海市'曙光计划'项目(05SG26)
关键词 序批式反应器 厌氧-低氧 硝化反硝化同时除磷 丙酸 乙酸 sequencing batch reactor (SBR) anaerobic-low dissolved oxygen simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal (SNDPR) propionic acid acetic acid
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Yoo K,Ahn K H,Lee H J,et al.Nitrogen removal from synthetic wastewater by simultaneous nitrification and denitrification(SND)via nitrite in an intermittently-aerated reactor[J].Water Research,1999,33:145 - 154. 被引量:1
  • 2Zeng R J,Saunders A M,Yuan Z G,et al.Identification and comparison of aerobic and denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms[J].Biotechnology Bioengineering,2003,83:140 -148. 被引量:1
  • 3Mosquera-Corral A,de Kreuk M K,Heijnen J J,et al.Effect of oxygen concentration on N-removal in an aerobic granular sludge reactor[J].Water Research,2005,39:2676-2686. 被引量:1
  • 4Oelmen A,Yuan Z,Blackall L L,et al.Comparison of acetate and propionate uptake by polyphosphate accumulating organisms and glycogen accumulating organisms[J].Biotechnology Bioengineering,2005,91:162- 168. 被引量:1
  • 5Zeng R J,Lemaire R,Yuan Z,et al.Simultaneous nitrification,denitrification,and phosphorus removal in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor[J].Biotechnology Bioengineering,2003,84 (2):710- 178. 被引量:1
  • 6Meyer R L,Zeng R J,Giugliano V,et al.Challenges for simultaneous nitrification,denitrification,and phosphorus removal in microbial aggregates:mass transfer limitation and nitrous oxide production[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2005,52:329-338. 被引量:1
  • 7Lemaire R,Meyer R,Taske A,et al.Identifying causes for N2O accumulation in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor performing simultaneous nitrification,denitrification and phosphorus removal[J].Journal of Biotechnology,2006,122:62-72. 被引量:1
  • 8Chen Y,Randall A A,McCue T.The efficiency of enhanced biological phosphorus removal from real wastewater affected by acetic to propionic acid ratio[J].Water Research,2004,38:27 -36. 被引量:1
  • 9Jenkins D,Richard M G,Daigger G T.Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking and foaming[M].(2nd edition).Florida:Lewis Publishers,1993. 被引量:1
  • 10Chen Y,Chen Y,Xu Q,et al.Comparison between acclimated and unacclimated biomass affecting anaerobic-aerobic transformations in the biological removal of phosphorus[J].Process Biochemistry,2005,40:723 - 732. 被引量:1

同被引文献154

引证文献10

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部