期刊文献+

科学客观性:外在性与内在性的交融 被引量:2

Scientific Objectivity:Integration of Exteriority and Interiority
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文试图从内在性与外在性两个层面重建科学客观性。一方面,科学对象的客观实在性并非一种外在于人的自在性,而是主体在自身的对象性活动中与客观世界耦合而得到的结果,是一种属人的现实,是在实践中被确立起来的。科学家们借助于直观方法与理性工具把所捉到实体与过程、类型与结构、解释句与理论模型等等,都在某种程度上独立于我们的主观表象,承载着对象的客观性——外在客观性。它们构成了"科学共同体"的"本体论承诺"。另一方面,这种外在的客观性,是在人类主体的内在化过程中实现的。在现代科学中,科学家们自觉地运用对称性工具实现的"内在化"所得到的"变换下的不变性",使得科学具有了公共可理解性与可接受性。这种在人类旨趣、目的和价值引领下对世界实行的主动干预所实现的公共性,就是内在客观性。因此,科学客观性是一曲由外在性与内在性合奏出来的交响曲。 In this essay, the author tries to reconstruct scientific objectivity from two aspects of exteriority and interiority. On one hand, the reality of scientific objects is not the trait of being-itself which is out of human being, but is the result of coupling between human and the objective world in human agent's activity, and is the reality of human which is established in human practice. The entities and process, types and constructs, and interpretation sentences and theoretical models, etc, which had been grasped by scientists with the help of intuitive methods and reasonable instruments, are in a way independent of our subjective representation, and bear the objectivity of scientific objects-external objectivity. It is them that constitute the "ontological commitment" of "the scientific community". On the other hand, the external objectivity is realized in the course of interiority of human agent. In modern science, it is "the inflexibility under transformation" reached in the course of scientists" interiority using the instrument of symmetry that makes science to be of public intelligibility and acceptability. Such acceptability realized in human's active interference-guided by human interests, aims and values-is internal objectivity. Hence, scientific objectivity is a symphony of external and internal objectivity.
作者 雷良
机构地区 中山大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第8期33-37,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 客观性 外在性 内在性 对称性 objectivity exteriority interiority symmetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1怀特海.科学与近代世界[M].北京:商务印书馆,1959.. 被引量:32
  • 2古祖雪.对称性:科学认识论的工具[J].中国社会科学,1989(1):147-156. 被引量:1
  • 3玻恩.我这一代的物理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964.183. 被引量:7
  • 4胡塞尔.经验与判断[M].北京:三联书店,1999.. 被引量:20
  • 5胡塞尔.欧洲科学的危机与超越论的现象学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.223,221,208,217,224,216,16,19. 被引量:95
  • 6Rudoulf Carnap. Meaning and Necessity [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1956. 205-221. 被引量:1
  • 7蒯因.从逻辑的观点看[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987.4. 被引量:38
  • 8Elizabeth Lloyd. Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies[J]. Syntheses, 1995(104): 351-381. 被引量:1
  • 9库恩.科学革命的结构[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.101、16、17、55、14、104、109、94-95、101. 被引量:138
  • 10Ludvig Landgrebe. The Phenomenological Concept of Experience [J]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 34, No. 1.1973 (Sep.): 1-13. 被引量:1

共引文献345

同被引文献34

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部