摘要
法定证据与自由心证是两种重要的证据制度,但学界对二者内涵的认识却存在颇多分歧。从历史的角度入手,可以探究出这两种证据制度的真实内涵为“证明力的判断方法和证明标准的规定”。据此,我国的诉讼证明模式毫无疑问地应该采取让法官自己去评价证据和认定事实的自由心证模式。
System of legal evidence and doctrine of discretional evaluation of evidence are two important systems of evidence, but scholars hold different opinions on the conception of the two systems. This paper begins with historical view to fred the real conception ofiegal evidence and discretional evaluation of evidence are the two sides of ＂the estimating method of the weight of evidence and the provision of standard of evidence＂, and based on those above it states the opinion of myself about the choose of mode of evidence.
出处
《河南公安高等专科学校学报》
2007年第4期66-68,共3页
Journal of Henan Public Security Academy
关键词
法定证据
自由心证
证明模式
Legal evidence
Discretional evaluation of evidence
Mode of evidence
