期刊文献+

ARMA(1,1)需求条件下需求信息延迟对两级供应链牛鞭效应和平均成本的影响 被引量:9

Impact of Demand Information Delay on Order Variation and Average Cost in a Two-stage Supply Chain with ARMA(1,1) Demand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了分析需求信息延迟对供应链绩效的影响,考虑由一个零售商和一个制造商所组成的两级供应链,顾客需求满足ARMA(1,1)过程。首先从理论上建立需求信息不延迟与需求信息延迟时零售商和制造商订单量波动程度的定量描述模型,通过两种情形下的比较分析得出:当需求自回归系数为正数时,需求信息延迟将减小牛鞭效应,当需求自回归系数为负数时,需求信息延迟将提高牛鞭效应;其次运用仿真方法对需求信息延迟与需求信息不延迟时制造商和零售商的平均成本进行了比较分析,同样得出:当需求自回归系数为正数时,需求信息延迟将降低制造商和零售商的平均成本,而需求自回归系数为负数时,需求信息延迟将提高制造商和零售商的平均成本。 To analyze the impact of demand information delay on order variation and average costs in a supply chain, a two stage supply chain with ARMA(1,1) demand, which consists of one retailer and one manufacturer, is considered. At first, the expressions for quantifying the retailer's and manufacturer's or- der variation when demand information is delayed, and when is not delayed, are developed respectively. It can be shown from comparison analysis between demand information delay and no demand information de- lay that, when demand auto-regression coefficient is positive, demand information delay can reduce the bullwhip effect; when demand auto-regression coefficient is negative, demand information delay can increase the bullwhip effect. Secondly, the simulation analysis is conducted to compare the retailer's and manufacturer's average cost between demand information delay and no demand information delay. It can be also shown that the demand information delay can reduce the retailer's and manufacturer's average costs when demand auto-regression coefficient is positive, and the demand information delay can increase the retailer's and manufacturer's average costs when demand auto-regression coefficient is negative.
出处 《系统管理学报》 北大核心 2007年第3期332-336,共5页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70573068) 上海市教委基金资助项目(05FZ11) 上海市重点学科建设资助项目(T0602)
关键词 需求信息延迟 牛鞭效应 平均成本 demand information delay bullwhip effect average cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Lee H L,Padmanabhan P,Whang S.Information distortion in a supply chain:the bullwhip effect[J].Management Science,1997,43:546-558. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Lee H L,Padmanabhan P,Whang S.Bullwhip effect in a supply chain[J].Sloan Management Review,1997,38(Spring):93-102. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Bourland K,Powell S,Pyke D.Exploring timely demand information to reduce inventories[J].European Journal of Operations Reseach,1996,92:239-253. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Gavirneni S,Kapuscinski R,Tayur S.Value of information in capacitated supply chains[J].Management Science,1999,45(1):16-24. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Lee H L,So Kut C,Tang Christopher S.The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain[J].Management Science,2000,46(5):626-643. 被引量:1
  • 6张钦,达庆利,沈厚才.在ARIMA(0,1,1)需求下的牛鞭效应与信息共享的评价[J].中国管理科学,2001,9(6):1-6. 被引量:59
  • 7[7]Zhang X.Delayed demand information and dampened bullwhip effect[J].Operations Research Letters,2005,33:289-294. 被引量:1
  • 8安鸿志著..时间序列的分析与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1983:344.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Box,G.E.P G.M.Jenkins 等.时间序列分析:预测与控制[M].中国统计出版社,1997.. 被引量:1
  • 2Chen F,Management Science,2000年,46卷,436页 被引量:1
  • 3Xu K,ICM'98 Shanghai,1998年 被引量:1
  • 4Chen F,Management Science,1998年,44卷,221页 被引量:1
  • 5Box G E P,时间序列分析.预测与控制,1997年 被引量:1

共引文献58

同被引文献140

引证文献9

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部