期刊文献+

改良的多西紫杉醇联合顺铂3周方案一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌 被引量:1

Modified three-weeks' docetaxel/cisplatin as first line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的:目前临床上广泛应用多西紫杉醇联合顺铂作为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线化疗方案,但传统3周方案毒副反应较大。因此本研究为比较多西紫杉醇联合顺铂改进的3周方案与传统3周方案一线治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效及毒副反应。方法:68例经组织学或细胞学确诊的ⅢB或Ⅳ期NSCLC患者,随机分为两组分别接受改进方案(A组)和传统3周方案(B组)化疗。A组:多西紫杉醇总剂量按75 mg/m^2,分两次分别于第1、8天,静脉滴注顺铂25 mg/(m^2.d),静脉滴注,第1天~第3天,每3周重复;B组:多西紫杉醇75 mg/m^2,静脉滴注,第1天,顺铂用法同A组,每3周重复。2周期后评价疗效与毒副反应,并随访1年生存率。结果:两组均无CR,A组PR 10例,SD 20例,PD 4例,总有效率为29%;B组PR 11例,SD 20例,PD 3例,总有效率为32%;A组1年生存率为38%,B组1年生存率为35%,两组疗效(P=0.793)及1年生存率(P=0.801)差异无显著性。中性粒细胞Ⅲ/Ⅳ度减少A组18%;B组47%,两组差异有显著性(P=0.010)。结论:多西紫杉醇联合顺铂改进的3周方案一线治疗NSCLC与传统3周方案相比,疗效相似,但血液学毒性明显下降,耐受性好。 Background and purpose: Docetaxel/cisplatin are widely used in chemo-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer( NSCLC), but the standard 3-weeks' project of docetaxel caused significant toxicity. We performed this study to compare the effect and toxicity of modified and standard 3-weeks' docetaxel/cisplatin as first line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. Methods: 68 patients with stage ⅢB or Ⅳ NSCLC (proven by histology or cytology) were randomly divided into two groups, modified (A) and standard (B) chemotherapy. Group A: docetaxel 75 mg/m^2, divided into 2 days, ivgtt d1 and d 8, cisplatin 25 mg/( m^2. d), ivgtt d 1-d 3, q3w; Group B: docetaxel 75 mg/m^2, ivgtt d 1, cisplatin was administered as Group A, q3w. The effect and toxicity were assessed after two cycles and one-year survival was followed up. Results: There was no CR in both groups. 10 PR, 20 SD, 4 PD were found in group A, the overall response rate is 29% ; whereas 11 PR, 20 SD, 3 PD were found in group B, the overall response rate is 32%. The one-year survival rate were 38% and 35% in group A and B, respectively. There were no significant difference about the overall response rate ( P = 0. 793) and one-year survival rate ( P = 0.801) between group A and B. The rates of grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ neutropenia were 18% and 47% in group A and B respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P =0. 010). Conclusions: In comparison with the standard 3-weeks' docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy, the modified one has similar response rate but lower hematologic toxicity, and thus it was well tolerated.
出处 《中国癌症杂志》 CAS CSCD 2007年第7期569-571,共3页 China Oncology
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 多西紫杉醇 顺铂 一线治疗 non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC docetaxel cisplatin first-line chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Jemal A,Murray T,Ward E,et al.Cancer Statistics,2005[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2005,55(1):10-30. 被引量:1
  • 2Carney DN.Lung cancer-time to move on from chemotherapy[J].N Engl J Med,2002,346(2):126-128. 被引量:1
  • 3Schiller JH,Harrington D,Belani CP,et al.Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].New Eng J Med,2002,346(2):92-98. 被引量:1
  • 4Chu Q,Vincent M,Logan D,Mackay JA,Evans WK; Lung Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-based Care.Taxanes as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer:a systematic review and practice guideline[J].Lung Cancer,2005,50(3):355-374. 被引量:1
  • 5Khuri FR.Docetaxel for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Current data and future directions as front-line therapy[J].Oncology (Williston Park),2002,16(6 Suppl 6):53-62. 被引量:1
  • 6Belani CP.Optimizing chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer:focus on docetaxel[J].Lung Cancer,2005,50S2:S3-S8. 被引量:1
  • 7Firvida JL,Amenedo M,Rodriguez R,et al.Docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin is a safe and active schedule as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer:results of a phase Ⅱ study[J].Invest New Drugs,2004,22(4):481-487. 被引量:1
  • 8Schuette W,Nagel S,Blankenburg T,et al.Phase Ⅲ study of second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with weekly compared with 3-weekly docetaxel[J].J Clin Oncol,2005,23(33):8389-8395. 被引量:1
  • 9Kim YH,Kim JS,Choi YH,et al.Phase Ⅱ study of docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in metastatic or unresectable localized non-small cell lung cancer[J].Int J Clin Oncol,2002,7(2):114-119. 被引量:1
  • 10郝学志,张湘茹,孙燕,多西他赛临床研究协作组.国产多西他赛治疗乳腺癌和非小细胞肺癌的临床观察[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(18):1064-1066. 被引量:24

二级参考文献9

  • 1Riou JF, Petitgenet O, Combeau C, et al. Cellular uptake and efflux of docetaxel (Taxotere) and paclitaxel (Taxol in P388 cell line[J]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res, 1994, 35:385~389. 被引量:1
  • 2Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer [J] N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(2): 92~98. 被引量:1
  • 3Frank V. Fossella, Russell DeVore. Randomized Phase Ⅲ Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens [J]. J Clin Onco, 2000, 18(12):2354~2362. 被引量:1
  • 4Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Lynch T, et al. Docetaxel (Taxotere)shows survival and quality-of-life benefits in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of two phase Ⅲ trials. Semin Oncol, 2001, 28(1 suppl 2):4~9. 被引量:1
  • 5Bonneterre J, Roche H, Monnier A, et al. Docetaxel vs 5-fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline therapy failure[]]. BrJ Cancer, 2002, 87(11):1210~1215. 被引量:1
  • 6Nabholtz JM, Senn HJ, Bezwoda WR, et al. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group []]. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(5):1413~1424. 被引量:1
  • 7Chan S, Friedrichs K, Noel D, et al. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The 303 Study Group[J].J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(8):2341~2354. 被引量:1
  • 8Ravdin P, ErbanJ, Overmoyer B, et al. Phase Ⅲ comparison of docetaxel and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer [J]. EurJ Cancer, 2003, 1(suppl 5):201~205. 被引量:1
  • 9孙燕,李维廉,管忠震,李丽庆,张湘茹,吴海鹰,朱思伟,梁艳,刘鹏,翟宇,张和平,魏开福.泰索帝治疗晚期乳腺癌和肺癌[J].中国新药杂志,1998,7(3):105-107. 被引量:65

共引文献23

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部