期刊文献+

A CALCULUS FOR SERVICES INNOVATION 被引量:4

A CALCULUS FOR SERVICES INNOVATION
原文传递
导出
摘要 Innovation in the services area - especially in the electronic services (e-services) domain - can be systematically developed by first considering the strategic drivers and foci, then the tactical principles and enablers, and finally the operational decision attributes, all of which constitute a process or calculus of services innovation. More specifically, there are four customer drivers (i.e., collaboration, customization, integration and adaptation), three business foci (i.e., creation-focused, solution-focused and competition-focused), six business principles (i.e., reconstruct market boundaries, focus on the big picture not numbers, reach beyond existing demand, get strategic sequence right, overcome organizational hurdles and build execution into strategy), eight technical enablers (i.e., software algorithms, automation, telecommunication, collaboration, standardization, customization, organization, and globalization), and six attributes of decision informatics (i.e., decision-driven, information-based, real-time, continuously-adaptive, customer-centric and computationally-intensive). It should be noted that the four customer drivers are all directed at empowering the individual - that is, at recognizing that the individual can, respectively, contribute in a collaborative situation, receive customized or personalized attention, access an integrated system or process, and obtain adaptive real-time or just-in-time input. The developed process or calculus serves to identify the potential white spaces or blue oceans for innovation. In addition to expanding on current innovations in services and related experiences, white spaces are identified for possible future innovations; they include those that can mitigate the unforeseen consequences or abuses of earlier innovations, safeguard our rights to privacy, protect us from the always-on, interconnected world, provide us with an authoritative search engine, and generate a GDP metric that can adequately measure the growing knowledge economy, Innovation in the services area - especially in the electronic services (e-services) domain - can be systematically developed by first considering the strategic drivers and foci, then the tactical principles and enablers, and finally the operational decision attributes, all of which constitute a process or calculus of services innovation. More specifically, there are four customer drivers (i.e., collaboration, customization, integration and adaptation), three business foci (i.e., creation-focused, solution-focused and competition-focused), six business principles (i.e., reconstruct market boundaries, focus on the big picture not numbers, reach beyond existing demand, get strategic sequence right, overcome organizational hurdles and build execution into strategy), eight technical enablers (i.e., software algorithms, automation, telecommunication, collaboration, standardization, customization, organization, and globalization), and six attributes of decision informatics (i.e., decision-driven, information-based, real-time, continuously-adaptive, customer-centric and computationally-intensive). It should be noted that the four customer drivers are all directed at empowering the individual - that is, at recognizing that the individual can, respectively, contribute in a collaborative situation, receive customized or personalized attention, access an integrated system or process, and obtain adaptive real-time or just-in-time input. The developed process or calculus serves to identify the potential white spaces or blue oceans for innovation. In addition to expanding on current innovations in services and related experiences, white spaces are identified for possible future innovations; they include those that can mitigate the unforeseen consequences or abuses of earlier innovations, safeguard our rights to privacy, protect us from the always-on, interconnected world, provide us with an authoritative search engine, and generate a GDP metric that can adequately measure the growing knowledge economy,
出处 《Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2007年第2期129-165,共37页 系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)
关键词 Services innovation decision informatics software algorithms automation GLOBALIZATION collaboration CUSTOMIZATION integration adaptation STANDARDIZATION TELECOMMUNICATION ORGANIZATION business principles Services, innovation, decision informatics, software algorithms, automation, globalization, collaboration, customization, integration, adaptation, standardization, telecommunication, organization, business principles
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献31

  • 1[1]Beroggi, B.E.G. and W.A. Wallace,"Real-Time decision support for emergency management: an integration of advanced computer and communications technology",Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp18-26, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Burnes, J. P., W. Chang and J. M. Tien "An intrinsic assessment and comparison of biometric systems through wavelet analysis",2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Washington,DC, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism (Co-Chairs: L. M.Branscomb and R. D. Klausner), Making The Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism,Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, National Research Council, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Committee on The Role of Information Technology in Responding To Terrorism(Co-Editors: J. L. Hennessy, D.A. Patterson,and H. S. Lin), Information Technology for Counterterrorism, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, National Research Council, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Davis, L. M., K. J. Riley, G. K. Ridgeway, J.Pace, S. K. Cotton, P. Steinberg, K.Damphousse, and B. L. Smith, When Terrorism Hits Home: How Prepared Are State and Local Law Enforcement?, Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Department of Homeland Security (DHS),Securing Our Homeland: The DHS Strategic Plan, Washington, DC: DHS,2004(a). 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Department of Homeland Security (DHS),National Incident Management System,Washington, DC: DHS, 2004(b). 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Department of Homeland Security (DHS),National Response Plan, Washington, DC:DHS, 2004(c). 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Department of Homeland Security (DHS),Target Capabilities List, Washington, DC:DHS, Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Green, L. V. and P. J. Kolesar, "Improving emergency responsiveness with management science", Management Science,Vol. 50, pp1001-1014, 2004. 被引量:1

共引文献3

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部