摘要
"合理期限"仲裁是DSU用以确立执行期限的三种方式之一,仲裁员的主要职责是根据当事方的请求对执行期限进行裁决,一般不涉及执行方法与途径。在实践中,此类仲裁举证责任经历了一个由当事方共同举证到后来由责任方承担首要举证义务的过程,国内强行法具有表面证据效力。裁决的合理期限应当是责任方执行DSB裁决及建议的最短期限,另外,责任方国内法的相关规定、执行方式及复杂程度、发展中国家的英体困难等方面都是仲裁员在决定合理期限时所需要考虑的因素。
＂Reasonable period of time＂ arbitration is one of three means of deciding implementation period under DSU. The primary responsibility of the arbitrator is to decide implementation time upon the request of the members concerned and, generally, does not involve implementation method and path. In practice, the burden of proof of this arbitration experiences a process from common proof to burden of proof being born by responsible party and domestic mandatory law has the prama facie evidence effect. ＂Reasonable period of time＂ arbitration should be the possible shortest period to implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB. In addition, factors which effect on ＂the reasonable period of time＂ include the related domestic laws and regulations, implementation methods, complex degree, the real difficulty of developing countries and so on, which should be considered by arbitrators.
出处
《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第3期76-80,共5页
Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition
关键词
DSU
执行
合理期限
仲裁
DSU
implementation
reasonable period of time
arbitration
