期刊文献+

解构Lakoff的隐喻理论——对概念隐喻的否定 被引量:11

A Deconstructionist Approach to Lakoff's Theory of Metaphor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Lakoff的隐喻理论是认知语言学理论的一个重要组成部分,是对传统隐喻观的彻底背离,因为其理论强调隐喻的本质是储存在我们大脑中的概念,而隐喻表达只是隐喻概念在语言层面的派生。虽然概念隐喻理论对语言学以及其他领域产生了重大影响,但是,只要仔细研究,仍能揭示该理论存在不少严重的问题。本文从经验基础、隐喻表达和概念隐喻、原始隐喻、隐喻理解等方面深入剖析Lakoff及其合作者的隐喻理论,旨在论证概念隐喻既没有存在的基础,也没有存在的必要。 Lakoff's theory of metaphor, one of the important theories integral to cognitive linguistics, represents a radical departure from the traditional view on metaphor in that it emphasizes that metaphors are essentially concepts stored in our brains and metaphorical expressions are only derivatively instantiations of metaphorical concepts at linguistic level. In spite of the fact that the theory of conceptual metaphors has exerted a strong influence on linguistics and other disciplines, a close study will bring to light quite a few serious problems with it. This paper argues that conceptual metaphors have no basis for their existence, nor is it necessary to propose them, by dissecting the theory of metaphor advanced by Lakoff and his collaborators with reference to such aspects as experiential basis, metaphorical expressions and conceptual metaphors, primary metaphors, and understanding of metaphorical expressions.
作者 姚岚 李元江
出处 《西安外国语大学学报》 2007年第2期17-20,共4页 Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
基金 浙江省外文学会2007年重点项目"认知语言学的多维思考"的阶段成果(项目编号:ELT200730)
关键词 LAKOFF 经验基础 概念隐喻 原始隐喻 隐喻理解 Lakoff experiential basis conceptual metaphors primary metaphors understanding of metaphorical expressions
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1[1]Gibbs,R.W.What's cognitive about cognitive linguistics?[A].In E.H.Casad (ed.).Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods:The expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics[C].Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter,1996:27-53. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Glucksberg,S.& M.S.McGlone.When love is not a journey:What metaphors mean[J].Journal of Pragmatics,1996(31):1541-1558. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Grady,J.Foundations of Meaning:Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes[D].University of California,Berkeley,1997. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Grady,J.,S.Taub & P.Morgan.Primitive and compound metaphors[A].In A.Goldberg(ed.).Conceptual Structure,Discourse,and Language[C].Stanford CA:Centre for the Study of Language and Information,1996:177-187. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Haser,Verena.Metaphor,Metonymy,and Experientialist Philosophy[M].Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter,2005. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Jackendoff,R.S.and D.J.Aaron.Review of 'More than Cool Reason:A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor' by G.Lakoff and M.Turner[J].Language,1991(67):320-338. 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Johnson,C.Metaphor vs.conflation in the acquisition of polysemy:The case of see[A].In M.K.Hiraga,C.Sinha & S.Wilcox (eds.).Cultural,Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics:Selected Papers of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque,July 1995[C].Amsterdam:Benjamins,1999:155-169. 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Lakoff,G.Women,Fire,and Dangerous Things[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1987. 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Lakoff,G.Cognitive Semantics[A].In U.Eco,M.Santambrogio & P.Violi(eds.).Meaning and Representations[C].Bloomingtion:Indiana University Press,1988:119-154. 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Lakoff,G.and M.Johnson.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980. 被引量:1

二级参考文献29

共引文献57

同被引文献176

引证文献11

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部