期刊文献+

伽玛刀治疗血管性病变后脑水肿发生率的分析

The clinic analyses of the incidence rate of vascular disease' brain edema treated by Gamma Knife
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同的血管性疾病γ刀治疗后脑水肿的发生率。方法回顾十余年内经γ刀治疗的血管性病变358例,采用χ2检验探讨γ刀术后不同血管性病变及不同随访时间脑水肿发生率的差异性。结果γ刀术后,动静脉畸形(AVM)组水肿阳性率为47.5%,海绵状血管瘤组为25.9%,术后水肿发生率有显著性差异(P<0.01)。不同随访阶段水肿阳性率分别为:≤1年为47.3%,1~3年为38.0%,3~5年为37.1%,>5年为25.0%,不同随访阶段脑水肿发生率有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论脑水肿是γ刀治疗后最重要的并发症之一,术后1年内水肿的发生率最高。 Objective To study the incidence rate of brain edema of vascular disease treated by Gamma Knife. Methods To review the characters of brain edema of 358 cases treated by Gamma Knife for ten years and to find the different incidence rate of vascular disease. Results After treated by Gamma Knife, the positive rate of arterioavenous malformation (AVM) group was 47.5%, and that of cavernoma group was 25.9%. There was remarkable significance between the incidence rate of brain edema and cavemoma (P〈0.01). In different followed period, the positive rate of brain edema of vascular disease was separately. That was 47.3% in 1 year, 38.0% between 1-3 years, 37.1% between 3-5 years, and 25.0% beyond 5 years. The incidence rate of brain edema in different followed period had remarkable significance (P〈0.01). Conclusion Brain edema is one of the most important complications after treated by Gamma Knife. The tiptop of brain edema incidence rate is in the first year.
出处 《中国现代医药杂志》 2007年第5期11-13,共3页 Modern Medicine Journal of China
关键词 动静脉畸形 海绵状血管瘤 脑水肿 伽玛刀 立体定向放射外科 Arterioavenous malformation(AVM) Cavemoma brain edema Gamma Knife Stereotactic radiosurgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献37

  • 1柏秀松,封亚平,封雨,苏厚银.X-刀放射治疗脑动静脉畸形合并胶质瘤1例[J].中华神经外科疾病研究杂志,2004,3(4):372-372. 被引量:1
  • 2[1]Shin M,Kawamoto S,Kurita H,et al. Retrospective analysis of a 10-year experience of stereotactic radio surgery for arteriovenous malformations in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg, 2002; 97 (4): 779~ 784 被引量:1
  • 3[2]Soderman M, Rodesch G, Karlsson B, et al. Gamma knife outcome models as a reference standard in the embolisation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) ,2001; 143(8) :801 ~ 810 被引量:1
  • 4[3]Flickinger J C,Kondziolka D,Maitz AH,et al. An analysis of the dose-response for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery and other factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol, 2002; 63 (3): 347~ 354 被引量:1
  • 5[4]Bhatnagar A,Flickinger J C,Kondziolka D,et al. An analysis of the effects of smoking and other cardiovascular risk factors on obliteration rates after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001; 51 (4):969 ~ 973 被引量:1
  • 6[5]Yamamoto M,Jimbo M, Hara M, et al. Gamman knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformation: Long term follow-up results focusing on complications occurring more than 5 years after irradiation. Neurosurgery, 1996; 38 ( 5 ): 906 ~914 被引量:1
  • 7[6]Karlsson B,Lax Ⅰ,Soderman M. Risk for hemorrhage during the 2-year latency period following gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001 ;49(4): 1045~ 1051 被引量:1
  • 8[7]Aoki Y,Nakagawa K,Tago M, et al. Clincal evaluation of gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous maiformation. Radiat Med, 1996; 14 (5): 265~ 268 被引量:1
  • 9[8]Lindqvist M, Karlsson B, Guo WY, et al. Angiographic longterm follow-up data for arteriovenous malformations previously proven to be obliterated after gamma knife radiosurgery. Neurosurgery, 2000; 46 (4): 803 ~ 808 被引量:1
  • 10[1]Shin M, Kawamoto S, Kurita H, et al. Retrospective analysis of a 10-year experience of stereotactie radio surgery for arteriovenous malformations in children and adoleseents. J Neurosurg,2002,97(4):753. 被引量:1

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部