摘要
针对计算机软件著作权侵权问题,通过分析现有的SSO标准的适用问题和“接触”的证明标准问题,对“实质性相似+接触”原则提出了见解．认为这一原则的关键在于举证责任．权利人对“接触”的举证应该只要求证明到“接触”的可能性即完成了举证的责任,此后的举证责任即转移给了侵权嫌疑人,由此提出“合理来源的解释”．如提不出,则可判定其构成侵权．
This article is an attempt in analysis about how to distinguish and determine the computer software copyright document tort. The author showed his opinion about substantive similarity plus contact through analyzing the applicability of SSO Standard, identification standard of the contact, etc. The author believes that the key lies in the onus of the proof. The people who enjoys right is only required to testify the possibility of the contact, the people who is suspicious of tort ought to testify the rational source of the contact, otherwise the tort should be affirmed.
出处
《北京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第2期56-60,共5页
Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)
