摘要
论证概念的理解和界定是当代论证理论中一个非常重要却又极具争议的问题。本文在梳理当代论证理论发展脉络的基础上,详细探讨了丹尼尔.奥凯夫的两种论证概念的观点并澄清了与之相关的两个关键性的误解,进而提出一种当代论证理论中论证概念的双重维度解读方式。
The understanding and definition of argument has been an important but controversial issue in contemporary argumentation theory. Based On a detailed elucidation of Daniel O＇Keefe＇s distinction of ＂argument 1 and argument2＂ and a critical analysis of two widespread misunder-standings about it,this article puts forward a two-dimensional understanding of the concept of argument within contemporary argumentation the-ory.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期26-30,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
论证理论
论证概念
论证1和论证2
作为成果的论证和作为过程的论证
argumentation theory
the concept of argument
argument1 and argument2
argument as product and argument as process
