摘要
目的探讨父母亲的教育方式对抽动障碍儿童的影响。方法本研究采用病例对照的实验方法,对120例抽动障碍儿童和120例正常儿童进行了父母亲养育方式的量表调查,资料使用SPSS11.5软件进行t-检验及SAS8.0软件进行Logistic回归分析。结果病例组父亲“情感温暖、理解”得分明显低于对照组(t=-13.35,P<0.01),有显著性差异;病例组母亲“情感温暖、理解”得分明显低于对照组(t=-9.40,P<0.01),有显著性差异;而病例组父亲“惩罚、严厉”、“拒绝、否认”、“过分干涉”因子得分明显高于对照组(t值分别为18.00、6.18、11.66,P值均<0.01),病例组母亲“惩罚、严厉”,“过分干涉”,“过度保护”,“拒绝、否认”因子得分明显比对照组高(t值分别为15.46、7.91、12.47,P值均<0.01),有显著性差异,对上述统计检验有显著性差异的资料在SAS8.0统计软件包上进行逐步非条件Logis-tic回归分析,结果父亲“拒绝因子”及母亲“拒绝因子”为显著危险因素。结论抽动障碍儿童的父母存在不良教养方式,其中父母亲对患儿过多的拒绝和否定为显著危险因素。
Objective. To explore the effect of parental rearing patterns on tie disorders in children. Methods： The paper adopted ease control experimental method. The 120 children with TD and 120 normal children were implemented questionnaire about Egna Minnen av Barndoms Uppfostran （EMBU）. The data was handled and analysed with SPSS11. 5 and SAS8. 0 statistical soft system. Resuits ： EMBU showed： the factor ＂affect warmth＂ scores for the father and mother scale of EMBU in ease group were significantly lower than those of control group. The scores on factors such as ＂punishment＂ , ＂refusal＂, ＂interference ＂ of father and mother scale of EMBU in ease group were found significantly higher than those of the control group. Logistic stepwise regression analysis indicated that ＂refusal＂ of father and mother scale of EMBU were the most risky factors. Conclusion： The bad parental rearing patterns would be the risky factors which resulted in tie disorders. Among these factors ＂refusal＂ of father and mother scale of EMBU were the most risky factors.
出处
《中国优生与遗传杂志》
2007年第4期110-111,共2页
Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
关键词
抽动障碍
儿童
父母养育方式
危险因素
Tie disorders
Children
Parental rearing patterns
Risky factors
