期刊文献+

急诊冠状动脉介入治疗时应用主动脉球囊反搏装置效果观察 被引量:12

Effect of Intraaortic Balloon Pump Used During Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时,主动脉球囊反搏装置(IABP)的应用对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者手术耐受性、生命指征的影响。方法急诊PCI治疗中,对46例AMI和/或合并心源性休克的患者,在进行常规冠脉造影的同时紧急植入IABP装置,观察介入治疗过程中IABP装置植入前后患者的手术耐受性、有创血压、心率、即刻死亡率等指标变化。结果45例患者植入IABP成功,1例失败;40例患者(86.96%)能够耐受急诊PCI治疗全过程,总死亡率10.87%;具有明显心源性休克临床表现的患者66.67%能够耐受治疗,死亡率33.33%;未出现明显的心源性休克临床表现的患者94.12%能够耐受治疗,死亡率2.94%;35例顺利完成PCI治疗,成功率85.36%。结论急诊PCI治疗中IABP的快速植入可预防大面积心梗患者心源性休克的发生,对已合并心源性休克的患者可减轻症状,提高手术耐受性和手术成功率,降低死亡率。 Objective To observe the effect of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) on tolerance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), life signs of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during emergency PCI performed. Methods 46 AMI patients complicated with or without cardiogenic shock were put on IABP at same time of coronary angiography when emergency PCI performed, and tolerance of PCI, blood pressure, heart rate and immediate death rate of patients were observed before and after operation. Results 45 cases had IABP successful and 1 case failed. 40 patients (86.96%) could endure whole emergency PCI process, the total death rate was 10.87%. 66.67% of patients with obvious cardiogenic shock could endure emergency PCI, the death rate was 33.33%; 94.12% of patients without cardiogenic shock could endure PCI treatment and the death rate was 2.94%. 35 cases completed PCI treatment and the successful rate was 85.36 %. Conclusion PCI supported by IABP can prevent AMI patients from cardiogenic shock, ease symptoms of patients complicated with cardiogenic shock, improve the tolerance and successful rate of the PCI treatment, and decrease immediate death rate.
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 2007年第4期382-383,共2页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 急性心肌梗死 心源性休克 主动脉球囊反搏装置 介入治疗 acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock intraaortic balloon pump intervention treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Black A, Cortina R, Bossi I, et al. Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: correlates of midterm survival and impact of patient selection[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37: 832-838. 被引量:1
  • 2Lee MS, Makkar RR. Percutaneous left ventricular support devices[J]. Cardiol Clin, 2006,24:265-275. 被引量:1
  • 3Kar B, Butkevich A, Civitello AB, et al. Hemodynamic support with a pereutaneous left ventrieular assist device [J].Tex Heart Inst J,2004,31:84-86. 被引量:1
  • 4Vranckx P, Foley DP, de Feijter PJ, et al. Effective use of the TandemHeart during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Int J Cardiovasc Intervent, 2003,5 :35-39. 被引量:1
  • 5Becker RC, Gore JM, Lambrew C, et al. A composite view of cardiac rupture in the United States National Registry of Myocardial Infarction[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1996, 27:1321-1326. 被引量:1
  • 6Domanski MJ, Topoi EJ. Cardiogenic shock., current understandings and future research direction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1994,74:724. 被引量:1
  • 7DeWood MA, Notske RN, Hensley GR, et al. Intraaortic balloon eounterpulsation with and without reperfusion for myocardial infarction shock[J]. Circulation, 1980, 61:1105-1112. 被引量:1
  • 8Chen JM, DeRose JJ, Slater JP. Improved survival rates support LVAD implantation early after myocardial infarction [J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,33:1903-1908. 被引量:1
  • 9Mahaffey KW, Kruse KR, Ohman EM. Perspectives on the use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in the 1990s [M]//Topol EJ. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996: 303-321. 被引量:1
  • 10Thiele H, Lauer B, Hambreeht R, et al. Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-to-femoral atrial bypass assistance[J].Circulation,2001,104 : 2917-2922. 被引量:1

同被引文献35

引证文献12

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部