摘要
《文心雕龙》与《诗品》的比较,本文突出了以下三点:(一)回到已经逝去1500年的历史时光,看那个时代所提出的问题和提供的思想养料,在准确认识理论产生的社会和文学背景的基础上,把握各自理论的基本倾向,保证比较的客观性。(二)抓住“吟咏情性”这个基本路线和理论核心,站在文学思想的高度来看它们之间的异与同,重点关注《文心雕龙》由“情”与“体”两个核心范畴及其相互关系构成的缘情理论体系,解开其文学思想复杂性的症结。(三)比较的重点是《文心雕龙》与《诗品》对“吟咏情性”基本路线的理论突破,抓住各自最独特的贡献,做有深度和有意义的比较。由于以往的研究对《诗品》独特之处的注意相对地少,因此本文于此着力较多,期以提高比较的质量。
In the comparison between The Literary mind and the Carving of the Dragon and Grades of Poetry, the author emphasized three aspects hereinafter. 1, going back to 1500 years ago to check the questions raised and mental nutrients provided in that time, on the base of finding the exact social and literary background of theories to hold the basic inclinations of different theories, we could make sure that the comparison was objective. 2, in The Literary mind and the Carving of the Dragon, grasping the basic route and theoretic core of ＂cultivating one＇s nature by reciting＂, comparing them from the high plane of literary thought, the author focused on the system of the theories about conveying emotion by reciting, which comprised main conceptions of ＂emotion＂ and ＂subject＂ and their relationship, in order to explain the complication of its literary thought. 3, the main point was the theoretic breakthrough for the basic route of ＂cultivating one＇s nature by reciting＂ in two books. The author did a deep and meaningful comparison of their most particular contribution. Since other critics had paid less attention to the distinctive feature of Grades of Poetry, the author concentrated his efforts on it in order to improve the credibility of the comparison.
出处
《南京师范大学文学院学报》
2007年第1期118-128,共11页
Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
关键词
《文心雕龙》《诗品》
比较
“吟咏情性”
The Literary mind and the Carving of the Dragon, Grades of Poetry, comparison, ＂cultivating one＇ s nature by reciting＂
