期刊文献+

神经刺激器引导用于臂丛神经阻滞及术后镇痛研究 被引量:1

神经刺激器引导用于臂丛神经阻滞及术后镇痛研究
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察神经刺激器定位下经斜角肌间沟留置导管用于持续臂丛神经阻滞及术后镇痛的临床效果和可行性。方法 ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级上肢手术患者60例。随机分为套管针组(A组)和留置导管组(B组),每组30例。A组患者用20G静脉穿刺套管针行常规方法臂丛神经阻滞留置,B组患者在周围神经刺激器引导下穿刺置入专用的柔软导管,手术结束后两组患者均连接一电子镇痛泵行持续术后臂丛神经阻滞镇痛。结果 术中需辅助用药患者两组无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。A组患者术后镇痛失败率达23.3%,B组无镇痛失败患者,两组比较差异有显著性(P〈0.05)。剔除A组镇痛失败患者后,两组患者术后48h内的VAS评分、Ramsay评分和PCA按压次数无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。结论 周围神经刺激器精确引导下经斜角肌间沟留置导管行臂丛神经阻滞和持续术后镇痛是一种可行性好、镇痛效果确切、不良反应少的方法。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effects and feasibility of interscalene brachial plexus block and postoperative analgesia using a Nerve Stimulator and a continuous catheter insertion system, Methods 60 patients ef ASA class Ⅰ~Ⅱ undergoing upper extremity surgery, aged 21 ~ 58y, weighed 48 ~ 67 kg, were randomly divided into 2 groups. In group A , all the patients received traditional continous intetscalene brachial plexus block by using a 20 - guage intravenous cannula fixed to the skin with a tape. In group B, all the blocks were performed by using a nerve stimulator and a insulated touhy needle system, then a special soft catheter was threaded through the needle and were secured tightly. Postoperatively, a compute - controlled infusion system were connected to provided pain relief. Results The need for Ⅳ narcotics supplementation was compared in two groups. The failure rate of postoperative analgesia wns 23.3% in group A, it was significantly higher when compared with group B (P 〈0.05). In group B, all the patients were provided with successful pain relief. No statistically significant differences were noted in VAS, Ramsay scores and the frequency of PCA pressed between two groups after rejecting the group A patients failed to postoperative pain relief ( P 〉 0.05). Conclusions Interscalene brachial plexus block and postoperative analgesia using a nerve stimulator as guide and a continuous retention catheter insertion system provides a good way for pain relief after upper extremity surgery with good feasibility, ensured analgesia effects and little side effects.
作者 赵剑
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2007年第2期165-166,共2页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 神经刺激器 留置导管 臂丛神经阻滞 术后镇痛 nerve stimulator retention catheter brachial plexus block postoperative analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ramsay MA,Savege TM,Simpson BR,et al.Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone.BMJ,1974,2:656~659. 被引量:1
  • 2段宝霖.套管针在肌间沟阻滞法中应用体会[J].中华医学写作杂志,2000,7:1365-1366. 被引量:2
  • 3蒋茹,许灿然,杭燕南,孙大金.周围神经刺激器用于臂丛神经阻滞的疗效观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2000,16(12):625-626. 被引量:8
  • 4Borgeat A,Tewes E,Biasca N,et al.Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine after major shoulder surgery:PCIA vs PCA.Br J Anaesth,1998,81:603~605. 被引量:1
  • 5Kopacz DJ,Neal JM.Regional anesthesia and pain medicine:residency training-the year 2000.Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2002,27:9~14. 被引量:1
  • 6Denny NM,Barber N,Sildown DJ.Evaluation of an insulated Tuohy needle system for the placement of interscalene brachial plexus catheters.Anaesthesia,2003,58:554~557. 被引量:1
  • 7Klein SM,Grant SA,Greengrass RA,et al.Interscalene brachial plexus block with a continuous catheter insertion system and a disposable infusion pump.Anesth Analg,2000,91:1473~1478. 被引量:1
  • 8Rawal N,Allvin R,Axelsson K,et al.Patient-controlled regional nalgesia (PCRA) at home:controlled comparison between bupivacaine and ropivacaine brachial plexus analgesia.Anesthesiology,2002,96:1290~1296. 被引量:1
  • 9Ilfeld BM,Morey TE,Wright TW,et al.Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home:a randomized,double-blinded,placebo-controlled study.Anesth Analg,2003,96:1089~1095. 被引量:1

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Phillip OB, James CC. Perioperative management of patientsfor neural blockade. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesiaand Management of Pain, 1998, 3: 186. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Koons RA. The use of the block-aid monitor and plastic in-travenous cannulas for nerve blocks. Anesthesiology, 1962,31:290. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Desbordes J, Mille FX, Adent P, et al. Brachial plexus anes-thesia via an axillary route for emergency surgery: compari-son of three approach methods. Ann Frs Anesth Reanim,1998,17: 674-680. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Rodriguez J, Barcena M, Alvarez J. Axillary brachial plexusanesthesia: electrical versus cold saline stimulation. AnesthAnalg, 1996, 83: 752-754. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Bouaziz H, Narchi P, Mercier FJ, et al. Comparison betweenconventional axillary block and a new approach at the mid-humeral level. Anesth Analg, 1997, 84:1058-1062. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Fournier R, Van Gessel E, Gaggero G, et al. Postoperativeanalgesia with “3 in 1” femoral nerve block after prosthetichip surgery. Can J Anaesth, 1998, 45: 34-38. 被引量:1

共引文献8

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部