摘要
在这场旷日持久的价值本质论争中,无论以李德顺先生为代表的主客关系价值论,还是以赖金良先生为代表的“人道价值”论,都处于不断深化和发展当中,且在某种意义上正逐渐合流。主张主客关系论的并不反对人道价值的确立,只不过在他们看来人道标准就是满足人各种现实的需要;主张“人道价值”论的也不全然反对主客体关系价值的存在,而只反对把人理解成纯粹经验的存在,希望从人本身树立起能够代表人类尊严的超经验的价值标准。因此,当代哲学价值论的分歧实质不在于是否同意主客体关系的思维方式,而在于如何理解和把握人的主体性,它昭示着未来哲学价值论研究的德性化趋势。
In the lasting debate over the nature of value, both the subjectivity and objectivity relations represented by Mr. Li Deshun and the humane axiology represented by Mr. Lai Jinliang have been further developing in such a way that the two theories are moving closer to each other. Advocators of the former are not against establishment of the latter, though they claim that the humanist standard should meet the practical needs; the latter are not completely against the existence of the former, but only against the understanding of man as existence of experience, and therefore attempts to set up a standard of value that can represent human dignity and super-experience. The paper concludes that the divergence in values is in essence how to handle the subjectivity of man rather than if the way of thinking based on the subjectivity-objectivity relation is agreed upon. Instead, it is a question of how to understand and grasp the subjectivity of man, and points to a moralization tendency in studies of philosophic value in the future.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期48-53,共6页
Teaching and Research
关键词
主客关系论
“人道价值”论
价值主体
德性
the subjectivity-objectivity relation
humane axiology
value subjectivity ~ moral
