摘要
古典存在论可被视为真知-逻辑地说-是者三方结构。它在自身的范围内已走到尽头,陷入严重的危机。马克思的哲学是以逻各斯“去揭示存在”,因而也是一种存在论。他实现了对古典存在论的第一重超越:存在是人的实践活动,语言-理论(逻各斯)源出于实践(存在),而真理则根本是个实践的问题。这样的实践存在论要求它不止于理论地批判,更要从事现实地批判:消灭古典存在论“所由产生的现实的社会关系”。这正是它的第二重超越。
Classical ontology can be regarded as a combination of ＂episteme＂, logically speaking＂, and ＂being＂. The crux of classical ontology lies in what the being has to do to acquire episteme. Classical ontology failed to answer the question. Marx＇s philosophy is also a kind of ontology in that it tries to interpret ＂being＂ in terms of logos. His thoery, however, outperforms classical ontology in that it believes that ＂being＂ is human activities, language comes from practice, and truth comes from practice too. Such kind of ontology requires not only theoretical criticism, but also realistic criticism. Its aim is to get rid of the actual social relations from which classical ontology was derived.
出处
《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2007年第1期79-84,共6页
Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
马克思
存在论
古典存在论
实践存在论
实践
超越
Marx
ontology
classical ontology
practical ontology
practice
transcendence
