摘要
违约责任与侵权责任在很多方面存有差异,不过在瑕疵履行时又会发生竞合。当下违约责任与侵权责任的义务基础被统一起来,差别日趋减弱。违约责任与侵权责任的差别理论在立法上应给以弱化。我国合同法关于责任竞合的理论并不能给当事人以充分的救济,违约责任下应给予因一方违约而致另一方财产损失、人身伤害乃至精神损害的当事人救济。对于合同法第113条的规定应予检讨和完善。
There are a lot of differences between liability for breach of contract and liability for infringement of rights. However, they will meet coincidence under defective performance. Now the obligatory foundation of them is being unified and the differences between them are dying down gradually. So the two different theories of liabilities should be weakened in legislation. The theory of liabilities coincidence of the PRC contract law can＇t give the party enough remedies. We should give remedies to one party whose property loss, personal injury and moral damage result from the other party＇s breach of contract. Article 113 of the PRC contract law should be criticized and perfected.
出处
《德州学院学报》
2007年第1期76-80,共5页
Journal of Dezhou University
关键词
违约责任
侵权责任
竞合
加害给付
liability for breach of contract
liability for infringement of rights
coincidence
injuring performance
