摘要
目的研究同步蓝牙心电诊断系统记录心电信号的准确性,同时评价其安全性和有效性。方法入选30例患者。每例应用同步蓝牙心电诊断系统以及美国GE公司生产的MAC-5000RestingECGSystem12导联同步心电图机,按照标准心电图导联的位置记录并打印二份心电图,分为蓝牙组与MAC组。对二组心电图进行波形与心电图临床诊断的比较,同时二组进行时间和幅度参数的比较。结果二组波形与心电图诊断完全一致。二组之间P波、QRS时限;PR和QT间期之间无显著性差异。二组之间除了Ⅱ导联R波幅度以及V5导联P波和S波幅度具有显著性差异之外,其余各导联的其它各波幅度均无显著性差异;Ⅱ导联R波幅度差值百分比为2.91%(0.026mV),小于心电图机国际及国家标准允许误差的范围;V5导联P波幅度差值百分比为11.8%,但绝对差值仅为0.009mV,无明显临床意义。蓝牙心电诊断系统传输数据安全正确。结论蓝牙心电诊断系统能准确提供12导联同步心电图记录。
Objective To validate the reliability and performance of a real-time wireless electrocardiogram（ECG） recording system utilizing Bluetooth technology （ Bluetooth System）. Methods Bluetooth System was tested on 30 cases. 2 electrocardiograms were recorded in all cases by Bluetooth System and MAC-5000 Resting ECG System（ MAC system）, respectively. 4 aspects of electrocardiograms were compared between 2 systems including the general waves, clinical diagno- sis, time and voltage parameters. Results Bluetooth system was the sames as MAC system in the general waves and clinical diagnosis of electrograms. Comparing to MAC system, only the voltage of R wave in lead Ⅱ and P wave in lead V5 is higher（0. 866 ± 0.521 mV vs 0. 840 ± 0.517 mV, 0. 069 ± 0. 054 mV vs 0. 060 ± 0.048 mV） in Bluetooth system （ P 〈 0.05）. There was no significant difference found in the other time and voltage parameters between 2 systems. Bluetooth system showed high safety in data transmission. Conclusion Bluetooth system has the same accuracy to MAC system in recording electrocardiogram. Bluetooth system is reliable for recording eleetrographie signals.
出处
《中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志》
2007年第1期41-43,共3页
Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology
关键词
心电图
蓝牙
诊断
准确性
Eleetrogram
Bluetooth
Diagnosis
Accuracy
