期刊文献+

反倾销等贸易壁垒与中美双边贸易问题 被引量:17

Trade Barriers, Especially Antidumping and Sino-U.S. Bilateral Trade Issues
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章经研究发现:(1)1995~2005年中国遭受的反倾销数量位居世界第一位,主要来源国是印度、美国和欧共体等;中国遭受的反倾销调查、最终措施指数分别为3.43和3.89,表示中国出口强烈地遭受到国外反倾销的影响。而同期美国遭受的反倾销强度指数小于1,表示美国出口较少受到他国反倾销的影响。(2)1995~2005年中国发起的反倾销调查、最终措施对称率均较低(0.26和0.20),而美国发起的对称率均较高(2.26和2.46)。并且,中国对美反倾销调查、最终措施对称率均较低(0.33和0.20)。基于反倾销对称性,入世后中国应加大反倾销应诉和起诉力度以抑制对华反倾销活动,并且应积极谋求WTO承认其市场经济地位。(3)1995~2005年美国对华发起的反倾销调查、最终措施指数分别为1.72和2.20,表示美国对华反倾销行动强烈地影响到美国从华进口。美国对华反倾销调查、最终措施对称率分别为3.05和5.00,表示美国对华反倾销强烈地影响到中关双边贸易。 The findings show: (1) the number of antidumping (AD) against China ranks first, and main originating countries or regions are India, the U. S. , and EC, etc; AD investigation index, and definitive measure indexes against China are 3.43 and 3. 89 respectively during 1995~2005, indicating that Chinese exports are badly affected by foreign AID actions. Whereas antidumping intensity index against the U. S. is less than 1, this indicates that the U. S. exports are slightly affected by other AD actions. (2) Symmetry ratios of Chinese AD investigations and AD definitive measures are both low (0.26 and 0. 20), whereas symmetry ratios of the U. S. are both high (2. 26 and 2.46) during 1995~2005. Moreover, the symmetry ratios of Chinese AID against the U. S. are both low (0. 33 and 0. 20). Thus, based on the antidumping symmetry, China should make great efforts to defending herself against dumping accusations and launching AD lawsuits in order to constrain AID actions against China. In addition, China should appeal actively to WTO for the status of market economy. (3) The U. S. AD investigation and definitive measure indices against China are 1.72 and 2. 20 respectively, indicating that the U. S. AD actions against China have severe effect on the U. S. imports from China. Symmetry ratios of the U. S. AID investigations and definitive measures against China are 3. 05 and 5.00 respectively, indicating that the U. S. AD actions against China have affected severely Sino-U. S. bilateral trade.
作者 沈国兵
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期101-111,共11页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2006BJL006)复旦大学"中国经济国际竞争力研究创新基地国际环境研究"子课题资助。
关键词 反倾销 反倾销强度指数 反倾销调查 反倾销最终措施 中关双边贸易 antidumping antidumping intensity index AD investiga-tions AD definitive measures Sino-U. S. bilateral trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1.《中国对外经济贸易年鉴2002》[M].中国对外经济贸易出版社,2002年版.第1151页. 被引量:3
  • 2http://www.wto.org/english/tratop e/adp e/adp ehtm#statistics,2006年9月公布. 被引量:1
  • 3Baldwin Robert.The political economy of reforming the anti-dumping laws[J].The World Economy,2005,28,(5):745~747. 被引量:1
  • 4Blonigen Bruce,Bown Chad.Antidumping and retaliation threats[J].Journal of International Economics 2003,60:249~273. 被引量:1
  • 5CBO or Congressional Budget Office.Antidumping action in the United States and around the world:An update[R].Washington DC:CBO Working Paper,2001:11~12. 被引量:1
  • 6Finger Michael Murray Tracy.Anti-dumping and countervailing duty enforcement in the United States[A].Finger M.Anti-dumping:How it works and who gets hurt[C].Michigan University Press,1993. 被引量:1
  • 7Irwin Douglas.The rise of U.S.antidumping actions in historical perspective[R].NBER Working Paper 2004,No.10582:1~19. 被引量:1
  • 8James William E.The rise of anti-dumping:Does regionalism promote administered protection[J].Asian-Pacific Economic Literature,2000,14(2):14~26. 被引量:1
  • 9Jiang Bin,Ellinger Alexander.Challenges for China-The World's largest antidumping target[J].Business Horizons,2003,46(3):25~30. 被引量:1
  • 10Mah Jai.Antidumping decisions and macroeconomic variables in the USA[J].Applied Economics 2000,32:1701~1709. 被引量:1

共引文献2

同被引文献111

引证文献17

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部