期刊文献+

大麦赤霉病抗源的发掘与评价 被引量:6

Selection and Evaluation of the Resistance barley to Fusarium Head Blight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了发掘新的大麦赤霉病抗源,2005、2006年利用禾谷镰刀菌单花滴注和喷雾接种相结合的方法,研究了287份大麦品种对赤霉病的抗扩展性和抗侵染性。结果表明,大麦赤霉病抗性除了抗初侵染类型外还存在抗扩展类型。比较两年单花滴注接种后21 d的病小穗率,筛选得到9个抗源,分别为盐96157、2000品12、秀9744、Vivar、Phoenix、盐94148、鉴35、盐97001、96AC20-30,占全部供试品种的3.44%。通过比较喷雾接种21 d后病小穗率、病穗率、病情指数、反应级等各项指标,发现9个抗源中存在三种类型:盐96157、2000品12、盐94148和Vivar属于既抗扩展又抗侵染的类型,秀977、鉴35和Phoenix属于抗侵染性较弱而抗扩展性强的类型,盐97001和96AC20-30属于抗侵染性强而抗扩展性较弱的类型。在9个抗源中96AC20-30抗侵染性也最强。 In 2005 and 2006, the resistance to spread and initial infection of Fusarium head blight was evaluated in 287 barley cultivars by using single floret injection and spore spaying. The result showed there is the resistance to spread as well as to initial infection of Fusarium head blight in barley. After comparing the proportion of scabbed spikelets(PSS) on 21 days after inoculation, 9 varieties were identified as resistant, they are Yan 96157,2000 Pin 12, Xiu 9744, Vivar, Phoenix, Yah 94148,jian 35, Yah 97001 and 96AC20-30, which occupying 3.44% of the total tested cultivars. The comparison Of different indexes such as proportion of scabbed spikelets(PSS),rate of diseased heads,diseased index,infection rating on 21 days after spore spraying suggested that three resistant types exited and 96AC20-30 was a cultivar which is high in resistance to initial infection.
出处 《麦类作物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期153-157,共5页 Journal of Triticeae Crops
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2004CB720407)
关键词 大麦 赤霉病 抗扩展性 抗侵染性 Barley Fusarium head blight Spread resistance Resistance to initial infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献9

共引文献30

同被引文献65

  • 1汪军妹,沈秋泉,杨建明,陶跃之,朱靖环.大麦赤霉病抗性研究进展[J].大麦科学,2005(2):1-4. 被引量:8
  • 2吴基日,刘宪虎,许明子,李艳茹.大麦品种对赤霉病的抗性鉴定[J].延边农学院学报,1996,18(1):7-11. 被引量:4
  • 3戈和静,马鸿翔,陆维忠,陈和,陈建民.大麦赤霉病抗扩展性鉴定与评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2006,7(4):409-414. 被引量:9
  • 4张大乐,高红云,李锁平.利用SSR标记技术分析中国啤酒大麦品种的遗传多样性[J].西北农业学报,2007,16(3):72-76. 被引量:20
  • 5Bai G, Shaner G. Management and resistance in wheat and barley to Fusarium head blight[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2004, 42 : 135 -- 161. 被引量:1
  • 6Pestka J J, Smolinski A T. Deoxynivalenol: toxicology and potential effects on humans[J]. Toxicology and Environmental Health (Part B):Critical Reviews, 2005, 8: 39--69. 被引量:1
  • 7Prom L K, Steffenson B J, Salas B, et al. Barley accessions resistant to Fusarium head blight and the accumulatuion of deoxynivalenol[J]. Cereal Research Communications, 1997, 25 (2) : 807--808. 被引量:1
  • 8Buerstmayr H, Legzdina L, Steiner B, et al. Variation for resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring barley[J]. Euphytica, 2004,137 . 279--290. 被引量:1
  • 9Takada K. Selection response and parent-offspring correlation of the resistance to fusarium head blight in barley[J]. Japanese Journal of Breeding, 1990, 40 (1): 91--101. 被引量:1
  • 10Takeda K, Current topics on the scab disease resistance in barley and wheat[J]. Proceedings of the Japanese Association of Mycotoxicology, 1992 , 36:13. 被引量:1

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部