摘要
非法言词证据与非法实物证据的取舍在标准的掌握上本身无实质性区别,取舍的标准首要在于对“非法”所涉的法律价值的判断问题。法律的价值包括秩序价值(形式价值)和正义价值(实质价值),其中法律的正义价值是法律的核心价值。证据的“非法性”虽损害了法律的秩序价值,而无损于法律的正义价值,该项非法属于形式非法,而非实质非法,该证据的“非法性”对证据的取舍则无影响。从法理的角度看,证据的“非法性”作为一种符号学的意义在于反映证据的外部特征和法律特性,并非为决定非法证据取舍的一个直接因素,而起决定作用的是“非法性”对法律正义价值影响的状况。
The standard of admission or exclusion of oral evidences and real evidences illegally obtained is same in fact, the standard firstly lies in a judgment to the value of law related to illegality. If illegality of evidences damages order value of law, the illegality of evidences beglongs to illegality in face, instead of illegality in fact, the illegality of evidences does not effect on admission or exclusion of evidences illegally obtained. As a symbol, the illegality of evidences reflects feature and legal characteristic of evidences, the value of legal justice is a direct factor to effect on admission or exclusion of evidences illegally obtained, instead of the illegality of evidences itself.
出处
《甘肃政法学院学报》
CSSCI
2007年第1期71-75,共5页
Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
基金
2005国家社会科学基金项目<刑事侦讯与侦查程序>(项目批准号:05BFX044)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
非法证据
法律价值
秩序
正义
evidence illegally obtained
legal value
order
justice
