摘要
分析家们一般将情绪看做非理性的、人性的一部分,并由此认为它是政治学第一意象路径的一部分。然而,情绪是理性的必需,而且第一意象并不等同于人性论。第一意象的解释可以独立于人性,而人性论也可以在不同的分析层次上展开。作者首先探究了情绪与理性之间的关系,认为情绪能逐渐侵蚀理性,但理性也依赖于情绪,进而作者将关于情绪的研究文献分为四种路径:作为一种副现象的情绪、作为非理性的来源之一的情绪、作为一种了解战略行动者的工具的情绪以及作为理性的一个必要方面的情绪。在逐步展开情绪的不同研究路径之后,作者探讨了情绪在不同分析层次的三种运用。
Analysts commonly view emotion as irrational, as part of human nature, and therefore as part of a first-image approach to politics. However, emotion is necessary to rationality and first-image and human nature arguments are not synonymous. A first-image explanation can be independent of human nature, and a human nature argument can be used at different levels of analysis. This article first explores the relationship between emotion and rationality and divides the literature on emotion into four groups: as epiphenomenal, as a source of irrationality, as a tool for savvy strategic actors, and as a necessary aspect of rationality. After developing the different approaches to emotion, the article explores three uses of emotion at different levels of analysis.
出处
《世界经济与政治》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第12期46-53,共8页
World Economics and Politics
