摘要
法律规避究竟是国际私法中的一项独立的制度,还是公共秩序保留制度的一部分?这个问题一直困扰理论界。法律规避作为国际私法的一项独立的制度,从实践层面讲,存在着意图认定上的主观性、效力认定上的矛盾性和处理后果上的消极性等缺陷;如果看作是公共秩序保留制度的一部分,不仅可以解决实践中的缺陷,从理论上讲也具有合理性。在我国国际私法立法中,法律规避没有独立存在的空间。
Whether, in international private law, the problem of evasion of law is an independent system or part of public order has been troubling the academic circle. Taken as an independent system, it has some defaults concerned with practice. The defaults are the subjectivity of determination of intention, the contradiction of determination of effectiveness and the negativity of disposal of effect. If it is regarded as part of public order, the defaults above will not only be solved in practice, but also sound reasonable in theory. In Chinese legislation of private international law, there is no room left for the system to live independently.
出处
《三峡大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2006年第6期98-101,共4页
Journal of China Three Gorges University(Humanities & Social Sciences)
关键词
国际私法
法律规避
公共秩序保留
法律定性
international private law
evasion of law
the reservation of public order
qualification
