摘要
何为词的“本色”,是有宋以来词作者及词论家无法逾越的一个文体评判标准问题。自五代始,词被定为艳科的传统确立以来,虽经晏殊、柳永、欧阳修以至苏轼等人对词体词境进行开拓扩大,力图使词摆脱“艳科”,然而综观宋代词作,词的婉媚特色依然盛行,豪放风格的词亦呈方兴未艾之势。因此以何种标准为“本色”遂成为有宋乃至以后词评界一个颇具争议的论题。秦现、周邦彦的词被认为是宋代最具“本色“特征的作品,因此,本文以二人词作为文本范例,以历代词评为线索,深入探讨“本色”的含义。
What ＂natural quality＂ of Ci means is a problem about stylistic standard which couldn＇t be worked out by the authors and critics since Song Dynasty. Ever since it was determined in Wu Dai as the gaudy, though some people such as Yan Shu, Liu Yong, Ou Yangxiu and Su Shi tried to develop it, its graceful characteristic flourished as well as its bold and unconstrained style. Thus the standard about ＂natural quality＂ Guan＇s and Zhou Bangyan＇s Ci is considered to be the works becomes dispute in the field of critics in and since song. Qin with the characteristic of ＂natural quality＂ most in the dynasty. So the thesis takes the two poets＇ Ci as an example, and successive dynasties＇ criticism as a clue to probe into its meaning
出处
《四川职业技术学院学报》
2006年第4期51-54,共4页
Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College
关键词
本色
词话
秦观
周邦彦
Natural Quality
Ci
Qin Guan
Zhou Bangyan
