期刊文献+

4-7岁儿童对人的目的指向行为的归因研究

An Investigation of 4-7-Year-Old Children's Attribution of Human Goal-directed Action
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该研究根据人的三种基本生物需要(吃、喝、睡)设计动画故事脚本,通过计算机呈现的方式,探查4~7岁儿童对人的生物需要目的指向行为的归因。结果表明:(1)学前儿童能够对人的生物需要目的指向行为进行非意图的生物学解释,4岁至5岁是一个快速发展期;(2)学前儿童对人的生物需要行为的理解表现出不一致性,其“睡”和“吃”受社会因素影响较大。“喝水”表现为一种纯粹的生物需要(3)学前儿童对人的生物需要行为的满足与否能够采取灵活的多因果解释模式。 This arricle probes 4-7-years- old children ' s cause attribution of human beings' goal-directed action with three kinds of cartoon settings shown on the computer, basic human biological needs of eating, drinking and sleeping. The results show (1) the prcschoolers have non psychological attribution of human goal-directed action of biological needs, there is a fast period during from 4- year〈olds to 5-year-olds; (2) there are differences in children's cause attribution; social factors will influence such biological needs as "eating" and "sleeping", but drinking is a pure biological need and is not influenced by social factors; (3) the preschoolers explain human biological need action by flexible multiple cause attribution.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期1460-1463,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30270476) 国家科技部攀登计划专项任务(95-专-09)的资助
关键词 儿童 目的指向性 朴素心理学 朴素生物学 认知发展 children, goal-directed action, native psychology, naive biology, cognition development
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Opfer J E,Gelman S A.Children's and adults' models for predicting teleological action:the development of a biology-based model.Child development,2001,72:1367-1381 被引量:1
  • 2卿素兰,方富熹.儿童对生物目的指向性的认知发展[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(3):379-386. 被引量:2
  • 3Premack,D.The infant's theory of self-propelled objects.Cognition,1990,36:1-16 被引量:1
  • 4Gergely,G,Nadasdy et al.Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age.Cognition,1995,56:165-193 被引量:1
  • 5Baldwin,D.Early referential understanding:infants' ability to recognize referential acts for what they are.Developmental Psychology,1993,29:832-843 被引量:1
  • 6Spelke,E.S,Pillips,A.et al.Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action.In:D.Sperber,D.Premac & A.J.Rremac (Eds.).Causal cognition:A multidisciplinary debate.New York:Oxford University Press,1995:44-78 被引量:1
  • 7Csibra.G.Goal attribution without agency cues:the perception of "pure reason" in infancy.Cognition,1999,72:237-267 被引量:1
  • 8Premack,D.& Premack,A.J.Intention as psychological cause.In:S.Sperber,D.Premack & A.J.Premack (Eds.).Causal cognition:A multidisciplinary debate New York:Oxford University Press,1996:848-856 被引量:1
  • 9Smith.M.C.Cognizing the behavior stream:The recognition of intentional action.Child Development,1978,49:736-743 被引量:1
  • 10Shultz.Explaining human movements and actions:Children's understanding of the limits of psychological explanation.Cognition,1997,62:291-324 被引量:1

二级参考文献43

  • 1熊哲宏.儿童“心理理论”发展的“理论论”(The theory-theory)述评[J].心理科学,2001,24(3):334-337. 被引量:15
  • 2[1]Opfer J E, Gelman S A. Children' s and adults' models for predicting teleological action: the development of a biology-based model.Child development,2001, 72:1367~1381 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Premack D. The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 1990, 36:1~16 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Gergely G, Nadasdy Z, Csibra G, Biro. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 1995, 56:165~193 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Baldwin D. Early referential understanding: infants ' ability to recognize referential acts for what they are. Developmental Psychology,1993, 29:832~843 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Spelke E S, Pillips A, Woodward A L. Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In: D Sperber, D Premac, A J Rremac ed. Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.44~78 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Csibra G. Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of "pure reason" in infancy. Cognition, 1999, 72:237~267 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Smith,M.C.Cognizing the behavior stream: The recognition of intentional action. Child Development, 1978, 49:736~743 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Schultz et al. Development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistake, reflex, and passive movements. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 19:301~310 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Schultz, Wellman. Explaining human movements and actions: Childrn' s understanding of the limits of psychological explanation.Cognition, 1997, 62:291~324 被引量:1

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部