摘要
本文对“学案”的概念进行了甄别,对关于朱熹《伊洛渊源录》是否为学案体著作存在着的两种对立观点进行了辨析,认为应当认定《伊洛渊源录》为学案体的发端之作。同时,从学术史的角度考察了《伊洛渊源录》等学案体著作对先秦迄汉诸子学术史论、正史《儒林传》及目录著作等具有学术史性质著作的营养的汲取。
This article examines and distinguishes the concept of ＂case＂ , and differentiates and analyses the two opposite viewpoints on whether Zhu Xi＇s Record of Yi Luo＇s Origin was a works of case body or not. This thesis firmly believes that Zhu＇s book is the original works of case body. At the same time, from the angle of academic history, this article also inspects the absorption of nutrition by the case body works including Record of Yi Luo＇s Origin from the works with the quality of academic history like the doctrine on academic history by various schools in Qin Han, biographical style of Confucian schools, and some catalogue works.
出处
《湖北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2006年第6期773-776,共4页
Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
伊洛渊源录
学案体
学术史
case
case body
Record of Yi Luo＇ s Origin
academic history
