摘要
背景:急性传染性非典型性肺炎作为一种具有较强烈传染性的呼吸系统疾病,因病程发展迅速,症状严重,加之被迫隔离,远离亲情、友情支持,很多患者出现极度焦虑和恐慌,甚至抑郁和绝望,处于危机状态中迫切需要心理支持和帮助。目的:对急性传染性非典型性肺炎患者实施心理危机干预后的疗效评估。设计:对比观察。单位:解放军小汤山医院。对象:选择2003-05在解放军小汤山医院心理咨询中心[3]进行心理干预的680例急性传染性非典型性肺炎患者,男379例(55.74%),女301例(44.26%),平均年龄(35±7)岁。文化程度:初中以下占34.5%,高中占31.5%,大专以上占34.0%。100%伴有家人或同事感染的生活事件,其中有14.4%的人痛失亲人。病情程度:危重者占6.9%,稳定者占67.5%,康复期占25.6%。方法:①将进行了电话咨询、未参加电话互助小组、集体调试、个体咨询和集体咨询的489例患者列为干预组,其余191例患者列为对照组。②采用SCL-90评定表评估2组患者入院时心理健康状况,SCL-90评分方法包含躯体化、强迫、人际敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性等9种因子,采用分级评分法,级数越高,症状越严重。③对干预组患者进行综合心理干预模式,包括:发放文字材料--自我调试宣传手册,医护人员关爱,电话心理咨询,集体调试,个体咨询,心理医生辅导等;对照组患者只接受发放的文字材料-自我调试宣传手册以及医护人员的关爱。出院前对干预组与对照组采用SCL-90进行重新评估。④发放综合心理干预效果问卷(主要从对自我与社会认知、情绪情感、生活行为方式、生理及躯体症状4个纬度进行,采用等级评分方法,得分越高,干预效果越好,每1问题均采用自评与他评2种形式,如果自评与他评结果一致,认为问卷有效,否则视为无效)对2组患者进行干预效果评定。⑤采用SCL-90将所有患者入
BACKGROUND： Severe acute respiratory syndrome （SARS） is a kind of very strong infective respiratory system diseases. Due to rapid development of disease course, severe symptoms, forced isolation, being away the supports from relatives and friends, many patients with SARS presented extremely anxiety and panic, even depression and despair, and they are in the crisis state and need mental support and help.
OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the therapeutic effect of mental crisis intervention in patients with SARS.
DESIGN： Controlled observation.
SETTING： Xiaotangshan Hospital of Chinese PLA.
PARTICIPANTS： Totally 680 patients with SARS who received the mental intervention in the Psychological Counseling Center, Xiaotangshan Hospital of Chinese PLA in May 2003. The patients, 379 male （55.74%）and 301 female （44.26%）, were aged （35±7） years. Degree of education： 34.5% of patients received education below junior high school, 31.5 % senior high school and 34.0% college. 100% of the patients had family member or colleague-infected life events, and 14.4% of the patients lost their family members. Degree of disease： 6.9% of patients were in the severe period, 67.5% in the stable period and 25.6% in the rehabilitation period.
METHODS： ① Totally 489 patients who received telephone counseling, and attended telephone mutual-help group, group debugging, individual counseling and group counseling were chosen, serving as intervention group, and the other 191 patients served as control group. ② The mental health state of patients in the 2 groups was evaluated at admission with symptom checklist 90 （SCL-90）, which consisted of somatization, obsessivecompulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychoticism 9 factors. The grading scoring was used. The higher grades, the more severe symptoms. ③ The patients of intervention group were given comprehensive mental intervention, which included handing out materials（ self-debugging pr
出处
《中国临床康复》
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第42期193-195,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
