摘要
目的 研究汉语普通话噪声中听力测试（heating in noise test，HINT）句子测试材料在不同方言听力正常人中的测试效果。方法 使用BLIMP测试软件对不同方言地区和北京市正常听力受试者各10名（分别为方言组和对照组）进行汉语普通话HINT的测试。根据评分单位：字（character）、词（word）和反应正确性的判定尺度（尺度1：100％字词反应正确；尺度2：75％～99％字词反应正确；尺度3：50％～74％字词反应正确）的组合，对受试者进行6组参数下的测试：尺度1／字、尺度1／词、尺度2／字、尺度2／词、尺度3／字、尺度3／词。对各组参数得到的方言组和对照组的句子识别阈值（reception threshold for sentences，RTS）分别进行Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果6组参数尺度1／字（P〈0．001）、尺度1／词（P〈0．001）、尺度2／字（P=0．006）、尺度2／词（P=0．001）、尺度3／字（P=0．017）、尺度3／词（P=0．006）得到的RTS组间差异具有统计学意义。方言组测试结果整体上差于对照组。结论 汉语普通话HINT应用于方言区患者时应该对测试方法和结果判断标准作适当调整。
Objective To explore the application of Mandarin HNIT test on Chinese dialect speakers with normal hearing, and to compare two language segmentations i.e. character and word used in HINT scoring. Methods 10 Chinese dialect speakers and 10 Mandarin speakers were tested using Mandarin HINT implemented by BLIMP. According to different scoring segmentations and different response criteria, 6 sets of parameters were used including： rulel/character, rulel/word, rule2/character, rule2/ word, and rule3/character and rule3/word. Compared were RTSs resulted from Mandarin HINT between dialect group and mandarin group were compared using wilcoxon ranksum test. Results Significant differences were found between dialect group and mandarin group under all 6 sets of parameters including rulel/character （P 〈 0.001）, rulel/word （P 〈 0.001）, and rule2/character （ P = 0.006） ,rule2/word （ P = 0.001）, rule3/character （ P = 0.017） and rule3/word （ P = 0.006）. Generally, dialect speakers performed worse than mandarin speakers. No significant differences were found between character segmentation and word segmentation. Conclusion When used to dialect speakers, mandarin speech audiometry materials should be adjusted in scoring rules and test procedures according to characteristics of different dialectal tone.
出处
《听力学及言语疾病杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2006年第6期413-415,共3页
Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
