摘要
目的评价电视性斜颈儿童的扫视、追随及空间感知功能,探讨儿童电视性斜颈的成因。设计病例对照研究。研究对象电视性斜颈儿童30例,正常儿童30例。方法记录电视性斜颈儿童的主导眼及头位偏斜情况,应用Top Vision2．0软件对所有被检者进行扫视、追随及空间感知功能的评价并进行比较。主要指标主导眼,头位偏斜方向,扫视、追随及空间感知功能评分。结果电视性斜颈儿童右眼为主导眼18例,左眼为主导眼12例,15例面转向主眼方向,13例面转向非主眼方向。其扫视、追随及空间感知功能与对照组比较无统计学差异。结论电视性斜颈儿童的主导眼与头位偏斜方向无固定关系,其扫视、追随及空间感知功能正常,斜颈可能由多因素所致。(眼科,2006,15：309-311)
Objective To assess saccades, pursuits and spatial judgments of children with television（TV ） torticollis and investigate the reason of TV torticollis in children. Design Comparative case series. Participant 30 children with TV torticollis and 30 normal children. Method Recorded the dominant eye and the deviated head posture of children with TV torticollis. Saccades, pursuits and spatial judgments of all cases were assessed by using Top Vision 2.0 software; and the results were compared between normal children and children with TV torticollis. Main Outcome Measure The dominant eye and the head posture of children with TV torticollis, the score of saccades, pursuits and spatial judgment. Result In children with TV torticollis, the dominant eye was the right eye in 18 cases and the left eye in 12 cases. The faces turned towards the dominant eye in 15 cases and towards the non-dominant eye in 13 cases. There was no significant difference in saccades, pursuits or spatial judgment between the two groups. Conclusion There is no permanent correlation between the dominant eye and the head posture in children with TV torticollis. Their functions of saccade, pursuit and spatial judgment are normal. The torticollis may be due to multiple factors.
出处
《眼科》
CAS
2006年第5期309-311,共3页
Ophthalmology in China
关键词
电视性斜颈
主导眼
扫视
追随
TV torticollis
dominant eye
saccades
pursuits
