期刊文献+

燃煤电厂排烟方式对比研究 被引量:17

Comparative research on the flue gas exhausting methods in coal-fired power plants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较计算燃煤电厂烟气的抬升高度和落地空气质量浓度,讨论通过常规的烟囱排放或通过冷却塔排放哪种方式更有利于空气环境质量的改善。计算方法采用德国标准规范的烟团抬升模式和污染物扩散模式。比较方案选择了冷却塔和烟囱各3种设计方案。计算结果表明,使用149.6m高的冷却塔排放烟气,其抬升高度明显高于其他方案,其一次性落地空气质量浓度明显小于其他方案;使用120m高的冷却塔和240m烟囱排放烟气,其抬升高度和一次性落地空气质量浓度结果相当;210m烟囱不加GGH方案的情况为最差。 The uplifted height and subsided consistency of coal-fired power plant were compared and calculated. The ways to exhaust the flue gas, including the stack emission and cooling tower emission, are discussed from the point of air quality improvement. Calculation for puff model and pollution dispersion model was in accordance with Germany standards. Six comparison projects have been selected, three of which are stack emission and others are cooling tower emission. The calculation results show that the uplifted height is distinctively higher than others while the subsided consistency is the least in case of the 149.6-m cooling tower for flue gas exhausting. The calculation results of 120-meter-high cooling tower and the stack of 240 meters are almost the same. Result of the 210-m-stack without GGH is the worst.
出处 《中国电力》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第10期73-76,共4页 Electric Power
关键词 燃煤电厂 排烟方式 烟塔合一 抬升高度 落地空气质量浓度 coal-fired power plant flue gas exhausting method cooling tower with flue gas injection uplifted height subsided consistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1VDI 3784 Blatt 2,Umweltmeteorologie,Ausbreitungsrechnung bei Ableitung von Rauchgasen über Kühltürme[S].1990. 被引量:1
  • 2VDI 3782 Blatt 3,Ausbreitung yon Luftverunreinigungen in der atmosphare berechnung der abgasefahnenüberh(o)hung[S].1985. 被引量:1
  • 3SCHATZMANN M,POLICASTRO A J.An advanced integral model for cooling tower plume dispersion[J].Atm.Environ,1984 (18):663 -674. 被引量:1

同被引文献138

引证文献17

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部