期刊文献+

春秋战国时期儒法刑罚思想的对抗 被引量:2

On Confrontation between Confucian and Legalist Penalty Philosophies in the Spring and Autumn and Warring States Periods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在春秋战国时期的刑罚思想上,儒家偏重于“礼义教化”,以刑辅德,法家偏重于“重刑威慑”,以刑去刑。这只是各自维护社会秩序的方式、手段不同,而在道德理想和治国目的上两者是相通的。 Turbulent social transformation during the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods led to an unprecedented animation in the field of ideology; and various schools of thought, including Mohist and Taoist put forward their political and legal philosophies, among which Confucianism and Legalist being the most prominent. With respect to Penalty philosophy, Confucianism advocated ‘moralization through the sense of propriety and justice', assisting morality; while Legalists propounded ‘deterrence of crimes with penalty'. Nevertheless, differences in their approaches and means of regulating social order couldn't deny the fact that their moral ideal and goals in the administration of state affairs remained basically the same.
作者 张翅 宋玲
出处 《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第5期579-582,共4页 Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金 安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2004sk030)
关键词 儒家 法家 刑罚思想 对抗 Confucianism Legalist Penalty philosophy Confrontation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1范忠信著..中国法律传统的基本精神[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2001:419.
  • 2徐逸仁主编..中国当代刑法学[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1992:580.
  • 3徐永康.《论语》中的“先富后教”思想及其法文化价值[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1994,16(2):63-68. 被引量:1
  • 4杨景凡,俞荣根..孔子的法律思想[M].北京:群众出版社,1984:190.
  • 5俞荣根..儒家法思想通论[M],1998.
  • 6张国华主编..中国法律思想史[M].北京:法律出版社,1982:507.
  • 7范忠信等著..情理法与中国人 中国传统法律文化探微[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1992:240.

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部