摘要
探讨回指距离、干扰词的精细描述、干扰词的典型性对回指推理的影响。包括2个实验,164名大学生被试。实验1探讨干扰词精细描述类型的影响。结果表明,干扰的精细描述并非是影响回指推理的主要因素。实验2探讨干扰词和先行词的典型性类型的相对变化的影响。结果表明高典型干扰在不同回指距离条件下都会对回指推理产生影响。从而表明高典型的干扰项干扰了回指推理发生。
This research was designed to explore three text factors that influence the accessibility of antecedents： referential distance, the elaboration of the distractor, the typicality of the distractor. Three experiments were administered. The So were 164 university students. Experiment 1 explored the effect of distractors＇ elaboration on anaphoric inference. It was indicated that elaboration of the distractor was not sufficient to eliminate anaphoric resolution. Experiment 2 examined the relative change＇s effect of the distractor＇s typicality and the antecedent＇s typicality on anaphoric inference. The results of Experiment 2 showed that high-typicality of the distractor causd unsuccessful anaphoric inference. These results show that the main factor infwencing anaphoric inference is the typicality of distractor-the semantic overlapping between the anaphor and antecedent.
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第5期1144-1148,1136,共6页
Journal of Psychological Science
基金
广东省哲学社会科学规划心理学研究项目(05SXZ002)
全国教育科学十五规划重点项目(青年专项)资助课题(EBA030412
